ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On delivery times in packet networks under adversarial traffic
Full text PdfPdf (242 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures archive
Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures table of contents
Barcelona, Spain
SESSION: Routing 1 table of contents
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-840-7
Authors
Adi Rosén  Technion, Haifa, Israel
Michael S. Tsirkin  Technion, Haifa, Israel
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007912.1007914
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider packet networks and make use of the "adversarial queuing theory" model [10]. We are interested in the question of guaranteeing that all packets are actually delivered to destination, and of having an upper bound on the delivery times of all packets. Whether this is possible against all rate-1 adversaries was previously posed as an open question [15, 10].Among other, we give a queuing policy that guarantees bounded delivery time whenever the rate-1 adversary itself can deliver all packets in bounded time and adheres to certain additional conditions. On the negative side we show that even the adversary itself cannot deliver all packets in bounded time for all rate-1 sequences of packets. We thus answer the open question posed by Gamarnik [15]. We further show that delivering all packets while maintaining stability (we coin the term "reliability" for this property) can be done by an offline scheduler whenever the injection of packets is done at rate of at most 1. Thus any rate-1 adversary can have this property. But, on the other hand, we also show that there is no online protocol (even centralized) that can achieve that property against all rate-1 adversaries. We thus answer an open question of Borodin et al. [10].


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
R. Cruz, A Calculus for Network Delay, Part I: Network Elements in Isolation, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, pp. 114--131, 1991.
 
13
R. Cruz, A Calculus for Network Delay, Part II: Network Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, pp. 132--141, 1991.
14
15
 
16
D. Gamarnik, Using Fluid Models to Prove Stability of Adversarial Queueing Networks. In IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 741--747, 2000.
 
17
A. Goel. Stability of Networks and Protocols in the Adversarial Queueing Model for Packet Routing. Networks, 37(4):219--224, 2001.
 
18
D. Koukopoulos, S. E. Nikoletseas, P. G. Spirakis, The Range of Stability for Heterogeneous and FIFO Queueing Networks. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC TR01-099), 2001.
 
19
 
20


REVIEW

"Bernard Kuc : Reviewer"

With so many badly written papers being published each month, it is difficult to be critical of one that is written so well, and so clearly. The only aspect of the paper available to criticize is its academic content, and it is a challenge to do s  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Adi Rosén: colleagues
Michael S. Tsirkin: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: