ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Topic prediction based on comparative retrieval rankings
Full text PdfPdf (55 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Sheffield, United Kingdom
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages: 506 - 507  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-881-4
Author
Chris Buckley  Sabir Research, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 31,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1008992.1009093
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A new measure, AnchorMap, is introduced to evaluate how close two document retrieval rankings are to each other. It is shown that AnchorMap scores, when run on a set of initial ranked document lists from 8 different systems, are very highly correlated with categorization of topics as easy or hard, and separately, are highly correlated with those topics on which blind feedback works. In another experiment, AnchorMap is used to compare the initial ranked document list from a single system against the ranked document list from that system after blind feedback. Again, high AnchorMap values are highly correlated with both topic difficulty and successful application of blind feedback. Both experiments are examples of using properties of a topic which are independent of relevance information to predict the actual performance of IR systems on the topic. Initial experiments to attempt to improve retrieval performance based upon AnchorMap failed; the causes for failure are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1



Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: