ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The impact of participation in information system design: a comparison of contextual placements
Full text PdfPdf (259 KB)
Source Participatory Design archive
Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Volume 1 table of contents
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
SESSION: Methodological considerations table of contents
Pages: 102 - 111  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-851-2
Authors
Magnus Irestig  Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Henrik Eriksson  Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Toomas Timpka  Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
CPSR : Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 166,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1011870.1011883
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

To compare the outcomes of participatory and user-centered contextual design, case study methods and the Activity Checklist derived from Activity Theory are used to analyze two system prototypes developed in the same organizational setting. Systematic differences between the prototypes are identified regarding focus on tool, organization, individual, and relation to current power structures and organizational practices. The resulting participatory design prototype reflected a sharper focus on collective use, social processes and to pragmatically fit into the organization whereas the user-centered prototype focused on individual use, the computer system and solutions that require substantial changes in work procedures. The differences between the prototypes are discussed and related to the specific aspects of the design methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Beyer H., and K. Holtzblatt. Contextual Design. Morgan Kaufman, New York, 1998.
 
2
Blomberg J., L. Suchman, and R. Trigg. Reflections on a work-oriented design project. Human-Computer Interaction 11(3), 1996, 123--154.
 
3
Bravo E. The Hazards of leaving out the Users, In Schuler D. and Namioka A. (Eds) Participatory Design. Principles and Practices Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1993, 3--11.
 
4
Brown J, Duguid P. Borderline issues: social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction 9(1). 1994, 3--36
 
5
Buchannan R. Wicked problems in design thinking Design Issues etc. 8(2), 1992, 5--21.
6
 
7
Dittrich Y., Eriksén S., and Hansson C. PD in the Wild; Evolving Practices of Design in Use In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC `02) (Malmö, Sweden June 23--25 2002) CPSR Palo Alto CA, 2002, 124--134.
 
8
Ehn, P., and Sandberg Å., Local Union Influence on Technology and Work Organization: Some Results from the DEMOS project. In Briefs, U., Ciborra, C. and Schneider, L. (eds.), Systems Design For, With and By the Users. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, 427--437.
 
9
Ehn P., Kyng, M. and Sundblad, Y. The Utopia Project: on Training, Technology, and Products viewed from the Quality of Work Perspective. In Briefs, U., Ciborra, C. and Schneider, L. (eds.), Systems Design For, With and By the Users. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, 439--449.
 
10
Ehn, P., and Kyng, M. The collective resource approach to systems design. In Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge, Aldershot, UK: Avebury; Brookfield, VT: Gower 1987, 17--57.
 
11
Fischer G., and Ostwald J Seeding, Evolutionary growth, and Reseeding: Enriching Participatory Design with Informed Participation. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC `02) (Malmö, Sweden June 23--25 2002) CPSR Palo Alto CA, 2002, 135--143.
 
12
Floyd, C., Mehl, W.-M., Reisin, F.-M., Schmidt, G., and Wolf, G. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. Human-Computer Interaction, 4(4), 1989, 253--350.
 
13
 
14
Hirscheim R. Assessing Participatory Systems Design: Some Conclusions from an Exploratory Study, Information and Management, 6 1983, 317--327.
 
15
Hughes J.A., D. Randall, and D. Shapiro. From ethnographic record to system design: some experiences from the field. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): an International Journal, 1(3), 1993, 123--141.
 
16
Irestig M., Pilemalm S., Hallberg N., Eriksson H. and Timpka T. Design of a Prototype Computer Network Service in Large Non-profit Non-governmental Organizations: The case of Labor Union Shop Stewards. Submitted 2003.
17
 
18
Kensing F., Simonsen J., and Bødker K. MUST -- a method for participatory design. Human-Computer Interaction 13(2) 1998, 167--198.
 
19
Nelander S., Söderlund M. and Ivarsen O. Om klyftor i informationssamhället {On breaches in the information society} LO Report No 51 Stockholm Sweden 2000.
 
20
Pilemalm S., Hallberg N. and Timpka T. How do shop stewards perceive their situation and tasks? Preconditions for support of union work. Economic and Industrial Democracy: an International Journal, 22(4) 2001, 569--599.
 
21
Pilemalm S., Hallberg N. and Timpka T. From Utopia to DLK -- Management of External Voices in Large Participatory Design Projects. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC `00) (New York NJ Nov 29--Dec 1 2000) CPSR Palo Alto CA, 2000, 156--165.
22
 
23
Rittel H. On the planning crisis: system analysis of the "first and second generation". Bedriftokonomen, no. 8, 390--401, 1972.
24
25
 
26
Yin, R. K. Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Sage Publications. 1994.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Magnus Irestig: colleagues
Henrik Eriksson: colleagues
Toomas Timpka: colleagues