Making tea: iterative design through analogy

ABSTRACT

The success of translating an analog or manual practice into a digital interactive system may depend on how well that translation captures not only the functional what and how aspects of the practice, but the why of the process as well. Addressing these attributes is particularly challenging when there is a gap in expertise between the design team and the domain to be modeled. In this paper, we describe Making Tea, a design method foregrounding the use of analogy to bridge the gap between design team knowledge and domain expertise. Making Tea complements more traditional user-centered design approaches such as ethnography and task analysis. In this paper, we situate our work with respect to other related design methods such as Cultural Probes and Artifact Walkthroughs. We describe the process by which we develop, validate and use analogy in order to maximize expert contact time in observation, interviews, design reviews and evaluation. We contextualize the method in a discussion of its use in a project we ran to replace a paper-based synthetic chemistry lab book with an interactive system for use in a pervasive lab environment.

REFERENCES

• 1: Hugh Beyer , Karen Holtzblatt, Contextual design, interactions, v.6 n.1, p.32-42, Jan./Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/291224.291229]
• 2: Bloomberg, J. L. Ethnography: Aligning field studies of work and design. Perspectives on HCI: Diverse Ap-proaches. Academic Press, London, 1995, 175--197.
• 3: Susanne Bodker , Pelle Ehn , Joergen Knudsen , Morten Kyng , Kim Madsen, Computer support for cooperative design (invited paper), Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.377-394, September 26-28, 1988, Portland, Oregon, United States [doi>10.1145/62266.62296]
• 4: John M. Carroll, Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000
• 5: Andrew Clement , Peter Van den Besselaar, A retrospective look at PD projects, Communications of the ACM, v.36 n.6, p.29-37, June 1993 [doi>10.1145/153571.163264]
• 6: Timothy Chklovski, Learner: a system for acquiring commonsense knowledge by analogy, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture, October 23-25, 2003, Sanibel Island, FL, USA [doi>10.1145/945645.945650]
• 7: De Roure, D., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N. Research Agenda for the Semantic Grid: A Future eScience Infrastructure, in Grid Computing: Making the global infrastructure a reality, Berman, F., Fox, G., and Hey, T. (eds), Wiley Europe, 2003, 437--470.
• 8: Diaper, D. and Stanton, N. (eds). The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside, NJ, 2003.
• 9: Dillon, A. Beyond Usability. Canadian Journal of Information Science 26(4) (2001), 57--69.
• 10: Dix, A. Deconstructing Experience - pulling crackers apart. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003, 165--178.
• 11: Dix, A. Absolutely Crackers. Computers and Fun 4. York, UK, 29th November 2001. http://www.hcibook.com/alan/papers/crackers2001/.
• 12: Sarah A. Douglas , Thomas P. Moran, Learning text editor semantics by analogy, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.207-211, December 12-15, 1983, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/800045.801612]
• 13: Thomas D. Erickson, Working with interface metaphors, Human-computer interaction: toward the year 2000, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1995
• 14: Bill Gaver , Tony Dunne , Elena Pacenti, Design: Cultural probes, interactions, v.6 n.1, p.21-29, Jan./Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/291224.291235]
• 15: Dan Gruen, Stories and storytelling in the design of interactive systems, Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.446-447, August 17-19, 2000, New York City, New York, United States [doi>10.1145/347642.347809]
• 16: Hemmings, A, Rodden, T., Cheverst. K, Clarke. K., Dewsbury, G., Hughes, J., Rouncefield, M. Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings. OzChi2003.
• 17: Hughes, G., Mills, H., Smith, G. schraefel, m.c.,Frey, J. Deconstructing the Tea Ceremony. An RDF model for a pervasive lab book system. 2003. http://www.smarttea.org/aspirin.html
• 18: Bonnie A. Nardi, Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1995
• 19: Marc Rettig, Prototyping for tiny fingers, Communications of the ACM, v.37 n.4, p.21-27, April 1994 [doi>10.1145/175276.175288]
• 20: m. c. schraefel , Gareth V. Hughes , Hugo R. Mills , Graham Smith , Terry R. Payne , Jeremy Frey, Breaking the book: translating the chemistry lab book into a pervasive computing lab environment, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.25-32, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985696]
• 21: schraefel, m.c. and Dix, A. Within Bounds and Between Domains: Making Tea as neutral territory for design elicitation. Discussion Paper. < http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00008820/>
• 22: Sperschneider, W., Bagger, K. Ethnographic Fieldwork Under Industrial Constraints: Towards Design-In-Context. Proceedings of NordiCHI, 2000.
• 23: Clay Spinuzzi, A Scandinavian challenge, a US response: methodological assumptions in Scandinavian and US prototyping approaches, Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation, p.208-215, October 20-23, 2002, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/584955.584986]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: User-centered design; Prototyping

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
chemistry, design elicitation, design methods, eScience, pervasive systems, tea