Communication functions and the adaptation of design representations in interdisciplinary teams

ABSTRACT

Design representations in user-centered design serve intentions for directing design process and communication functions for enlisting interdisciplinary participation. To disentangle these two factors, a vocabulary for identifying communication functions in design is proposed. This vocabulary, drawn from a selective review of empirical studies of design activity in architecture and engineering, is then applied to three design cases from user-centered design. This analysis shows how representational use is subject to adaptive pressure from the communication demands in interdisciplinary teams. The consequences of this pressure for understanding the nature of design are discussed.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York (1977).
• 2: Ernesto Arias , Hal Eden , Gerhard Fischer , Andrew Gorman , Eric Scharff, Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.7 n.1, p.84-113, March 2000 [doi>10.1145/344949.345015]
• 3: Susanne Bødker , Jacob Buur, The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.9 n.2, p.152-169, June 2002 [doi>10.1145/513665.513670]
• 4: Geoffery C. Bowker , Susan Leigh Star, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000
• 5: Louis L. Bucciarelli, Designing engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994
• 6: Bucciarelli, L.L. Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies, 5, 3 (1984), 185--190.
• 7: Paul R. Carlile, A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development, Organization Science, v.13 n.4, p.442-455, July 2002 [doi>10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953]
• 8: John M. Carroll, Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000
• 9: Alan Cooper , Paul Saffo, The Inmates Are Running the Asylum, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1999
• 10: Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990).
• 11: Bill Curtis , Herb Krasner , Neil Iscoe, A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.11, p.1268-1287, Nov. 1988 [doi>10.1145/50087.50089]
• 12: Darcy DiNucci, Adobe Master Class Web Site Redesigns, Adobe Press, 2001
• 13: Dreyfuss, H. Designing for People. Viking Press, New York (1974).
• 14: Douglas K. Van Duyne , James Landay , Jason I. Hong, The Design of Sites: Patterns, Principles, and Processes for Crafting a Customer-Centered Web Experience, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2002
• 15: Engelbart, D.C. Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. Stanford Research Institute Summary Report on Contract AF 49(638)--1024, 1962.
• 16: Flinchum, R. Henry Dreyfuss, Industrial Designer: The Man in the Brown Suit. Rizzoli, New York (1997).
• 17: Friedman, B. Personal communication, December, 2003.
• 18: B. Friedman , D. Howe , E. Felten, Informed Consent in the Mozilla Browser: Implementing Value Sensitive Design, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02)-Volume 8, p.247, January 07-10, 2002
• 19: Henderson, K. Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 4 (1991), 448--473.
• 20: Kathryn Henderson, On Line and on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998
• 21: Karsten, H., Lyytinen, K., Hurskainen, M. and Koskelainen, T. Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: Representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, (2001), 80--98.
• 22: Kirsh, D.T. The Context of Work. Human computer Interaction, 16, 2-4 (2001), 305--322.
• 23: Lewis, C. and Rieman, J. Task-Centered User Interface Design. Downloaded, December 2003, from <http://hcibib.org/tcuid/>
• 24: Wayne G. Lutters , Mark S. Ackerman, Achieving safety: a field study of boundary objects in aircraft technical support, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 16-20, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA [doi>10.1145/587078.587116]
• 25: Harold G. Nelson , Erik Stolterman, Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World - Foundations and Fundamentals of Design Competence, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2003
• 26: Mark W. Newman , James A. Landay, Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice, Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.263-274, August 17-19, 2000, New York City, New York, United States [doi>10.1145/347642.347758]
• 27: Jakob Nielsen , Robert L. Mack, Usability inspection methods, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1994
• 28: Perry, M. and Sanderson, D. Coordinating joint design work: The role of communication and artefacts. Design Studies, 19, 3 (1998), 273--288.
• 29: Steven Poltrock , Jonathan Grudin , Susan Dumais , Raya Fidel , Harry Bruce , Annelise Mark Pejtersen, Information seeking and sharing in design teams, Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, November 09-12, 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/958160.958198]
• 30: Rittel, H.W.J. Second-generation design methods. In Cross, N. ed. Developments in Design Methodology, Wiley, New York (1984), 317--327.
• 31: Mary Beth Rosson , John M. Carroll, Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 2001
• 32: Schön, D.A. Problems, frames and perspectives on designing. Design Studies, 5, 3 (1984), 132--136.
• 33: Schön, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983).
• 34: Schön, D.A. and Rein, M. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books, New York (1994).
• 35: Schmidt, K. and Wagner, I. Coordinative artifacts in architectural practice. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems. Saint Raphael, France, IOS Press, Amsterdam, City (2002), 257--274.
• 36: Frank M. Shipman, III , Catherine C. Marshall, Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, EmergingThemes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations inInteractive Systems, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.8 n.4, p.333-352, Oct. 1999 [doi>10.1023/A:1008716330212 ]
• 37: Sonnenwald, D.H. Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17, (1996), 277--301.
• 38: Diane H. Sonnenwald, Contested collaboration: a descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system design, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.31 n.6, p.859-877, Nov. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0306-4573(95)00002-X ]
• 39: Rick Spencer, The streamlined cognitive walkthrough method, working around social constraints encountered in a software development company, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.353-359, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/332040.332456]
• 40: Susan Leigh Star, The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving, Distributed Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1989
• 41: Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. Institutional ecology: 'Translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 3 (1989), 387--420.
• 42: Wagner, I. Persuasive artifacts in architectural design and planning. In Proceedings of CoDesigning 2000. Nottingham (2000), 379--390.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.1 Project and People Management
          Subjects: Systems analysis and design

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology; User-centered design; Theory and methods

General Terms:
Design

Keywords:
communication, design informatics, design information systems, design process, design representations, interdisciplinary design