ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Towards tight bounds for rule learning
Full text PdfPdf (154 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 69 archive
Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
Page: 90  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-828-5
Authors
Ulrich Rückert  Technische Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany
Stefan Kramer  Technische Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1015330.1015387
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While there is a lot of empirical evidence showing that traditional rule learning approaches work well in practice, it is nearly impossible to derive analytical results about their predictive accuracy. In this paper, we investigate rule-learning from a theoretical perspective. We show that the application of McAllester's PAC-Bayesian bound to rule learning yields a practical learning algorithm, which is based on ensembles of weighted rule sets. Experiments with the resulting learning algorithm show not only that it is competitive with state-of-the-art rule learners, but also that its error rate can often be bounded tightly. In fact, the bound turns out to be tighter than one of the "best" bounds for a practical learning scheme known so far (the Set Covering Machine). Finally, we prove that the bound can be further improved by allowing the learner to abstain from uncertain predictions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Blake, C., & Merz, C. (1998). UCI repository of machine learning databases.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Cohen, W. W. (1995). Fast effective rule induction. Proc. 12th International Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 115--123). Morgan Kaufmann.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Hoos, H. H. (1998). Stochastic local search -- methods, models, applications. Doctoral dissertation, TU Darmstadt.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Marchand, M., Shah, M., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Sokolova, M. (2003). The set covering machine with data-dependent half-spaces. Proc. 20th International Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 520--527). Morgan Kaufmann.
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
Rückert, U., & Kramer, S. (2003). Stochastic local search in k-term DNF learning. Proc. 20th International Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 648--655). AAAI Press.
 
16
Sokolova, M., Marchand, M., Japkowicz, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2003). The decision list machine. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (pp. 921--928). MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
 
17
 
18

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ulrich Rückert: colleagues
Stefan Kramer: colleagues