Breaking affordance: culture as context

ABSTRACT

The concept of affordance as it applies to user interface design is widely used and accepted; possibly overused. This paper explores one of the constraints on affordance: culture. Graduate and undergraduate students in the United Kingdom and the United States were surveyed and asked to make judgements about the behaviour of abstracted Western-like objects. The study clearly shows that UK subjects thought the down position of a light switch indicates it is "ON"; for their US counterparts it was "OFF." We suggest that context (in the case of this study, culture) is often overlooked, but is central to affordance, to computer interface design, as well as to action and activity more generally.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bærentsen K. B. and Trettvik J. (2002). An Activity Theory Approach to Affordance, ACM Interactions 6, 37--39.
• 2: Robert W. Bailey, Human Performance Engineering: A Guide for System Designers, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1982
• 3: Alan Cooper, About Face: The Essentials of User Interface Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1995
• 4: Evers V., Kukulska-Hulme A. and Jones A. (1999) Cross-cultural understanding of interface design: A cross-cultural analysis of icon recognition, In E. del Galdo and G. Prahbu (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Internationalisation of Products and Systems. Rochester, 20--22 May.
• 5: Emilie W. Gould , Norhayati Zakaria , Shafiz Affendi Mohd. Yusof, Applying culture to website design: a comparison of Malaysian and US websites, Proceedings of IEEE professional communication society international professional communication conference and Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM international conference on Computer documentation: technology & teamwork, September 24-27, 2000, Cambridge, Massachusetts
• 6: Hofstede G. (1991). Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.
• 7: James G. (1994). Gibson's Affordances, Psychological Review 101, 336--342.
• 8: Victor Kaptelinin , Bonnie A. Nardi , Catriona Macaulay, Methods & tools: The activity checklist: a tool for representing the “space” of context, interactions, v.6 n.4, p.27-39, July-Aug. 1999 [doi>10.1145/306412.306431]
• 9: Aaron Marcus , Emilie West Gould, Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design, interactions, v.7 n.4, p.32-46, July 2000 [doi>10.1145/345190.345238]
• 10: Middleton, D (2002). Succession and Change in the Socio-cultural Use of Memory: Building-in the Past in the Communicative Action, Culture & Psychology 8, 79--95.
• 11: Norman D (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday.
• 12: Oishi S., Diener E. F., Lucas R. E. and Eunkook S. M. (1999). Cross-Cultural variations in Predictions of Life Satisfaction: Perspectives From Needs and Values, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 25, 980--990.
• 13: Lucy A. Suchman, Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1987
• 14: Gerard Torenvliet, We can't afford it!: the devaluation of a usability term, interactions, v.10 n.4, July + August 2003 [doi>10.1145/838830.838857]
• 15: Trompenaars F. & Turner C. H. (1997). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business, McGraw-Hill.
• 16: Terry Winograd , Fernando Flores, Understanding computers and cognition, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1986

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.m Miscellaneous

Keywords:
affordance, culture, design context