| User involvement in e-government development projects |
| Full text |
Pdf
(253 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 82
archive
Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction
table of contents
Tampere, Finland
Pages: 217 - 224
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-857-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16, Downloads (12 Months): 170, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The deployment of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) methods and processes in e-Government development projects requires knowledge of how user involvement is actually conducted in these projects today. In order to generate such knowledge, an interview survey of Norwegian e-Government project leaders has been conducted. It was found that user involvement is regarded as important by e-Government project leaders, but actual user involvement is often conducted according to the participation practice of industrial democracy rather than the processes and methods advocated within the traditions of HCI. The most frequently deployed user involvement activity is user representation in project terms. Users employed by the government units responsible for the project are more often involved in the development process, and in earlier project phases. The majority of the e-Government projects did not include activities to ensure Universal Design. Studies published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the British Government indicate that the results of the present investigation may be generalized to other European countries. It is concluded that the current practice of e-Government development will benefit on the systematic introduction of HCI methods. Further work should focus on the integration of HCI methods with the user involvement practice of industrial democracy.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
eEurope 2005: An information society for all. Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, 2002.
|
| |
2
|
Maguire, M. C. User-Centred Requirements Handbook. HUSAT Research Institute, 1998.
|
| |
3
|
EN ISO 13407 Human-centred design processes for interactive systems, 1999.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Emery, F. and E. Thorsrud, Democracy at work: The report of the Norwegian industrial democracy program. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, 1976.
|
| |
6
|
Emery, M. and F. Emery, A choice of futures. International series on the quality of working life, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, 1976.
|
| |
7
|
Wilpert, B. E., Participatory research in organizational psychology. In G. d'Ydewalle, P. Eelen, and P. NBertelson (Eds.): International perspectives on psychological science: Vol 2. The state of the art. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ. (1994) 293--310.
|
| |
8
|
Elden, M., Sociotechnocal systems ideas as public policy in Norway: Empowering participation through worker-managed change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 3 (1986), 239--255.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
UsabilityNet. 2003. http://www.usabilitynet.org
|
| |
11
|
About eGovernment.http://europa.eu.int/information_society/programmes/egov_rd/about_us/text_en.htm
|
| |
12
|
eGov: The Official Web Site of the President's e-Government Initiatives. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/index2.html
|
| |
13
|
eEurope Benchmarking Report. Commission of the European Countries: Brussels, 2002.
|
| |
14
|
IKT i det offentlige 2002. Statskonsult: Oslo, Norway, 2002.
|
| |
15
|
Karlsen, T., Erfaringer fra store statlige IT-prosjekter. Statskonsult: Oslo, 1998.
|
| |
16
|
Moløkken, K., et al., Project Estimation in the Norwegian Software Industry - A Summary|. Simula research laboratory: Oslo, Norway, 2004.
|
| |
17
|
The Hidden Threat to E-Government. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2001.
|
| |
18
|
Pearce, S., Government IT projects. Parlamentary Office of Science and Technology, United Kingdom, 2003.
|
| |
19
|
eNorge 2005. Nærings- og Handels-departementet, Oslo, Norway, 2002.
|
|