ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Passive visual fingerprinting of network attack tools
Full text PdfPdf (332 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Visualization and data mining for computer security table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: VizSEC link analysis session table of contents
Pages: 45 - 54  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-974-8
Authors
Gregory Conti  Georgia Institute of Technology
Kulsoom Abdullah  Georgia Institute of Technology
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 226,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029208.1029216
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the dramatic visual fingerprints left by a wide variety of popular network attack tools in order to better understand the specific methodologies used by attackers as well as the identifiable characteristics of the tools themselves. The techniques used are entirely passive in nature and virtually undetectable by the attackers. While much work has been done on active and passive operating systems detection, little has been done on fingerprinting the specific tools used by attackers. This research explores the application of several visualization techniques and their usefulness toward identification of attack tools, without the typical automated intrusion detection system's signatures and statistical anomalies. These visualizations were tested using a wide range of popular network security tools and the results show that in many cases, the specific tool can be identified and provides intuition that many classes of zero-day attacks can be rapidly detected and analyzed using similar techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Teoh, S. Graphical Presentation of Stepping-Stone Pairs Found. Initial Results. http://graphics.cs.ucdavis.edu/ steoh/ research/tcpdump/tcpdump.html, last accessed April 2004.
 
4
Security Incident Fusion Tool, National Center for Advanced Secure Systems Research Group. http://www.ncassr.org/projects/sift/papers/, last accessed April 2004.
 
5
Cheswick, B and Burch, H. The Internet Mapping Project. http://research.lumeta.com/ches/map/, last accessed April 2004.
 
6
An Atlas of Cyberspaces. http://www.cybergeography.org/atlas/atlas.html, last accessed April 2004.
 
7
 
8
Erbacher, R and Frincke, D. Visual Behavior Characterization for Intrusion and Misuse Detection. Proceedings of the SPIE '2001 Conference on Visual Data Exploration and Analysis VIII, CA, January 2001, pp. 210--218.
 
9
Code Red Worm Infections. Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA) http://www.caida.org/tools/visualization/walrus/examples/codered/.
 
10
Juslin, J. Intrusion Detection and Visualization Using Perl. O'Reilly Open Source Conference 2001, San Diego, California, U.S.A., 23rd - 29th of July 2001.
 
11
Zalewski, M. Strange Attractors and TCP/IP Sequence Number Analysis. http://razor.bindview.com/publish/papers/tcpseq.html, last accessed April 2004.
 
12
Zalewski, M. Strange Attractors and TCP/IP Sequence Number Analysis - One Year Later. http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/newtcp/, last accessed April 2004.
 
13
 
14
Goodall, J. Information Visualization for Intrusion Detection. The Intrusion Detection Tool Kit (IDtk). http://userpages.umbc.edu/ jgood/idtk.php, last accessed April 2004.
 
15
SecureScope. Secure Decisions. http://www.securedecisions.com/, last accessed April 2004.
 
16
StealthWatch + Therminator. Lancope Corporation. http://www.stealthwatch.com/, last accessed April 2004.
 
17
Ethereal: A Network Protocol Analyzer. http://www.ethereal.com/, last accessed April 2004.
 
18
Etherape: A Graphical Network Monitor. http://etherape.sourceforge.net/, last accessed April 2004.
 
19
NetStumbler Homepage, <http://www.netstumbler.com/>, last accessed April 2004.
 
20
3D Traceroute Homepage, http://www.hlembke.de/prod/3dtraceroute/, last accessed April 2004.
 
21
The Xtraceroute Homepage. http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/ d3august/xt/, last accessed April 2004.
 
22
Fydor, "Top 75 Network Security Tools," http://www.insecure.org/tools.html, last accessed March 2004.
 
23
TCPDUMP Public Repository, http://www.tcpdump.org/, last accessed March 2004.
 
24
Snort Project Page. http://www.snort.org/, last accessed March 2004.
 
25
The Honeynet Project. http://project.honeynet.org/, last acccessed April 2004.
 
26
Ptacek, T and Newsham, T. Insertion, Evasion, and Denial of Service: Eluding Network Intrusion Detection. Secure Networks, Inc. January, 1998. http://www.insecure.org/stf/secnet_ids/secnet_ids.html, last accessed April 2004.
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
Spence, R. Information Visualization. Pearson Addison Wesley, December 2000.
 
31
 
32
 
33
Wegman, E. Hyperdimensional Data Analysis Using Parallel Coordinates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85:411, pp. 664--675.
 
34
 
35


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gregory Conti: colleagues
Kulsoom Abdullah: colleagues