ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Exploring the barrier to entry: incremental generational garbage collection for Haskell
Full text PdfPdf (459 KB)
Source International Symposium on Memory Management archive
Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Memory management table of contents
Vancouver, BC, Canada
SESSION: Implementation techniques table of contents
Pages: 163 - 174  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-945-4
Authors
A. M. Cheadle  Imperial College London
A. J. Field  Imperial College London
S. Marlow  Microsoft Research, Cambridge
S. L. Peyton Jones  Microsoft Research, Cambridge
R. L. While  The University of Western Australia, Perth
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029873.1029893
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We document the desi n and implementation of a "production" incremental garbage collector for GHC 6.2.It builds on our earlier work (Non-stop Haskell)that exploited GHC's dynamic dispatch mechanism to hijack object code pointers so that objects in to-space automatically scavenge themselves when the mutator attempts to "enter" them. This paper details various optimisations based on code specialisation that remove the dynamic space,and associated time, overheads that accompanied our earlier scheme.We detail important implementation issues and provide a detailed evaluation of a range of design alternatives in comparison with Non-stop Haskell and GHC's current generational collector.We also show how the same code specialisation techniques can be used to eliminate the write barrier in a enerational collector.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
 
9
J. DeTreville. Experience with conncurrent garbage collectors for Modula-2+. Technical Report 64, DEC Systems Research Center, Palo Alto, CA, August 1990.
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
W. Partain. The nofib Benchmark Suite of Haskell Programs. Dept. of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, 1993.
 
15
PAPI: Performance Application Programming Interface http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/
 
16
17
 
18
S. Peyton Jones. The Spineless Tagless g-machine: Second attempt. In Workshop on the Parallel Implementation of Functional Languages, volume CSTR 91-07, pages 147--91. University of Southampton, 1991.
 
19
S. Peyton Jones. Implementing lazy functional languages on stock hardware: the Spineless Tagless g-machine. In Journal of Functional Programming, pages 127--202, 1992.
 
20
S. Peyton Jones, S. Marlow, and A. Reid. The STG runtime system (revised). Draft paper, Microsoft Research Ltd, 1999.
21
 
22
 
23
R.A. Shaw. Improving garbage collector performance in virtual memory. Technical Report CSL-TR-87-323, Stanford University, March 1987.
24
 
25
Valgrind, an open-source memory debugger for x86-linux. http://valgrind.kde.org.
 
26
 
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
A. M. Cheadle: colleagues
A. J. Field: colleagues
S. Marlow: colleagues
S. L. Peyton Jones: colleagues
R. L. While: colleagues