Effective work practices for software engineering: free/libre open source software development

ABSTRACT

We review the literature on Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) development and on software development, distributed work and teams more generally to develop a theoretical model to explain the performance of FLOSS teams. The proposed model is based on Hackman's [34] model of effectiveness of work teams, with coordination theory [52] and collective mind [79] to extend Hackman's model by elaborating team practices relevant to effectiveness in software development. We propose a set of propositions to guide further research.

REFERENCES

• 1: Behlendorf, B. Open source as a business strategy. in Di Bona, C., Ockman, S. and Stone, M. eds. Open sources: Voices from the open source revolution, O'Reilly, San Francisco, 1999.
• 2: Bélanger, F. and Collins, R. Distributed Work Arrangements: A Research Framework. The Information Society, 14 (2). 137--152.
• 3: Bessen, J. Open Source Software: Free Provision of Complex Public Goods, Research on Innovation, 2002, 24 pages.
• 4: Bezroukov, N. Open source software development as a special type of academic research (critique of vulgar raymondism). First Monday, 4 (10).
• 5: Bezroukov, N. A second look at the Cathedral and the Bazaar. First Monday, 4 (12).
• 6: Cannon-Bowers, J.A. and Salas, E. Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22. 195--202.
• 7: Erran Carmel , Ritu Agarwal, Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development, IEEE Software, v.18 n.2, p.22-29, March 2001 [doi>10.1109/52.914734 ]
• 8: Chell, E. Critical incident technique. in Symon, G. ed. Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide, Sage, London, 1998, 51--72.
• 9: Cox, A. Cathedrals, Bazaars and the Town Council, 1998. Available from: http://slashdot.org/features/98/10/13/1423253.shtml. Accessed 22 March, 2004.
• 10: Crowston, K., Annabi, H. and Howison, J. Defining Open Source Software project success. in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2003), Seattle, WA, 2003.
• 11: K. Crowston , E. E. Kammerer, Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development, IBM Systems Journal, v.37 n.2, p.227-245, April 1998
• 12: Crowston, K. and Scozzi, B. Open source software projects as virtual organizations: Competency rallying for software development. IEE Proceedings Software, 149 (1). 3--17.
• 13: Cubranic, D., Open-source software development. in 2nd Workshop on Software Engineering over the Internet, (Los Angeles, 1999).
• 14: Cubranic, D. The ramp-up challenge in open-source software projects, Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, n.d.
• 15: Davor Cubranic , Kellogg S. Booth, Coordinating Open-Source Software Development, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Enabling Technologies on Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, p.61-68, June 16-18, 1999
• 16: Bill Curtis , Herb Krasner , Neil Iscoe, A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.11, p.1268-1287, Nov. 1988 [doi>10.1145/50087.50089]
• 17: Bill Curtis , Diane Walz , Joyce Elam, Studying the process of software design teams, Proceedings of the 5th international software process workshop on Experience with software process models, p.52-53, October 10-13, 1989, Kennebunkport, Maine, United States
• 18: Di Bona, C., Ockman, S. and Stone, M. (eds.). Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA, 1999.
• 19: Dougherty, D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3 (2). 179--202.
• 20: Edwards, K., Epistemic communities, situated learning and Open Source Software development. in Epistemic Cultures and the Practice of Interdisciplinarity Workshop, (NTNU, Trondheim, 2001).
• 21: Faraj, S. and Xiao, Y., Coordination in fast response organization. in Academy of Management Conference, (Denver, CO, 2002).
• 22: Fielding, R.T. The Apache Group: A case study of Internet collaboration and virtual communities, 1997. Available from: http://www.ics.uci.edu/fielding/talks/ssapache /overview.htm.
• 23: Franck, E. and Jungwirth, C. Reconciling investors and donators: The governance structure of open source, Lehrstuhl für Unternehmensführung und-politik, Universität Zürich, 2002.
• 24: Gacek, C., Lawrie, T. and Arief, B. The many meanings of Open Source, Centre for Software Reliability, Department of Computing Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, n.d.
• 25: Harald Gall , Karin Hajek , Mehdi Jazayeri, Detection of Logical Coupling Based on Product Release History, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, p.190, March 16-19, 1998
• 26: Gallivan, M.J. Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Information Systems Journal, 11 (4). 277--304.
• 27: Ghosh, R.A. Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study. Report of the FLOSS Workshop on Advancing the Research Agenda on Free / Open Source Software, 2002. Available from: http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS /report/workshopreport.htm.
• 28: Gladstein, D.L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (4). 499--517.
• 29: Robert L. Glass, Of Open Source, Linux ... and Hype, IEEE Software, v.16 n.1, p.128-127, January 1999
• 30: Goodman, P.S., Ravlin, E.C. and Argote, L. Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. in Goodman, P.S. and Associates eds. Designing Effective Work Groups, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1986, 1--33.
• 31: Grant, R.M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organizational Science, 7 (4). 375--387.
• 32: Graves, T.L. Inferring Change Effort from Configuration Management Databases, 1998.
• 33: Guzzo, R.A. and Dickson, M.W. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47. 307--338.
• 34: Hackman, J.R. The design of work teams. in Lorsch, J.W. ed. The Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986, 315--342.
• 35: Jacob Hallén , Anders Hammarqvist , Fredrik Juhlin , Anders Chrigström, Linux in the Workplace, IEEE Software, v.16 n.1, p.52-57, January 1999 [doi>10.1109/52.744569 ]
• 36: Hann, I.-H., Roberts, J., Slaughter, S. and Fielding, R. Economic incentives for participating in open source software projects. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, 2002, 365--372.
• 37: Hecker, F. Mozilla at one: A look back and ahead, 1999. Available from: http://www.mozilla.org/mozilla-at- one.html.
• 38: James D. Herbsleb , Rebecca E. Grinter, Splitting the organization and integrating the code: Conway's law revisited, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.85-95, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302455]
• 39: James D. Herbsleb , Audris Mockus , Thomas A. Finholt , Rebecca E. Grinter, An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, p.81-90, May 12-19, 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 40: Hertel, G., Niedner, S. and Herrmann, S. Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Projects: An Internet-based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany, n.d., 39 pages.
• 41: Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa , Dorothy E. Leidner, Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Organization Science, v.10 n.6, p.791-815, June 1999
• 42: Koch, S. and Schneider, G. Effort, co-operation and co-ordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Information Systems Journal, 12 (1). 27--42.
• 43: Kogut, B. and Metiu, A. Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17 (2). 248--264.
• 44: Kolodny, H. and Kiggundu, M. Towards the development of a sociotechnical systems model in Woodlands Mechanical Harvesting. Human Relations, 33. 623--645.
• 45: Robert Kraut , Charles Steinfield , Alice P. Chan , Brian Butler , Anne Hoag, Coordination and Virtualization: the Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships, Organization Science, v.10 n.6, p.722-740, June 1999
• 46: Robert E. Kraut , Lynn A. Streeter, Coordination in software development, Communications of the ACM, v.38 n.3, p.69-81, March 1995 [doi>10.1145/203330.203345]
• 47: Kuwabara, K. Linux: A bazaar at the edge of chaos. First Monday, 5 (3).
• 48: Lee, G.K. and Cole, R.E. The Linux Kernel Development As A Model of Open Source Knowledge Creation, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2000.
• 49: Evan Leibovitch, The Business Case for Linux, IEEE Software, v.16 n.1, p.40-44, January 1999 [doi>10.1109/52.744567 ]
• 50: Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. The open source movement: Key research questions. European Economic Review, 45. 819--826.
• 51: J. Ljungberg, Open source movements as a model for organising, European Journal of Information Systems, v.9 n.4, p.208-216, Dec. 1, 2000 [doi>10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000373 ]
• 52: Thomas W. Malone , Kevin Crowston, The interdisciplinary study of coordination, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.26 n.1, p.87-119, March 1994 [doi>10.1145/174666.174668]
• 53: Markus, M.L., Manville, B. and Agres, E.C. What makes a virtual organization work? Sloan Management Review, 42 (1). 13--26.
• 54: Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.11 n.3, p.309-346, July 2002 [doi>10.1145/567793.567795]
• 55: Glyn Moody, Rebel code: Linux and the open source revolution, Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA, 2001
• 56: Moon, J.Y. and Sproull, L. Essence of distributed work: The case of Linux kernel. First Monday, 5 (11).
• 57: Mortensen, M. and Hinds, P. Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams. in Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. eds. Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, 284--308.
• 58: Nardi, B.A. and Whittaker, S. The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. in Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. eds. Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, 83-110.
• 59: Nieva, V.F., Fleshman, E.A. and Rieck, A. Team Dimensions: Their Identity, Their Measurement, and Their Relationships, Advanced Research Resources Organizations, Washington, DC, 1978.
• 60: O'Mahony, S. and Ferraro, F., Managing the Boundary of an 'Open' Project. in Santa Fe Institute (SFI) Workshop on The Network Construction of Markets, (2003).
• 61: Tim O'Reilly, Lessons from open-source software development, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.4, p.32-37, April 1999 [doi>10.1145/299157.299164]
• 62: Pfaff, B. Society and open source: Why open source software is better for society than proprietary closed source software, 1998. Available from: http://www.msu.edu/user/pfaffben/writings/anp/oss-is-better.html.
• 63: Prasad, G.C. A hard look at Linux's claimed strengths..., n.d. Available from: http://www.osopinion.com /Opinions/GaneshCPrasad/GaneshCPrasad2-2.html.
• 64: Raymond, E.S. The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday, 3 (3).
• 65: Robey, D., Khoo, H.M. and Powers, C. Situated-learning in cross-functional virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (Feb/Mar). 51--66.
• 66: Scacchi, W. Understanding the requirements for developing Open Source Software systems. IEE Proceedings Software, 149 (1). 24--39.
• 67: Schach, S.R., Jin, B., Wright, D.R., Heller, G.Z. and Offutt, A.J. Maintainability of the Linux Kernel, 2003. Available from: http://www.vuse.vanderbilt.edu /%7Esrs/preprints/linux.longitudinal.preprint.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec, 2003.
• 68: Terry Shepard , Margaret Lamb , Diane Kelly, More testing should be taught, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.6, p.103-108, June 2001 [doi>10.1145/376134.376180]
• 69: Stamelos, I., Angelis, L., Oikonomou, A. and Bleris, G.L. Code quality analysis in open source software development. Information Systems Journal, 12 (1). 43--60.
• 70: Stewart, K.J. and Ammeter, T. An exploratory study of factors influencing the level of vitality and popularity of open source projects. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, 2002, 853--857.
• 71: Stewart, K.J. and Gosain, S., Impacts of ideology, trust, and communication on effectivness in open source software development teams. in Twenty-Second International Conference on Information Systems, (New Orleans, LA, 2001), 507-512.
• 72: Tuomi, I. Evolution of the Linux Credits File: Methodological Challenges and Reference Data for Open Source Research, 2002. Available from: http://www.jrc.es/ tuomiil/articles/EvolutionOfTheLinuxCreditsFile.pdf. Accessed 15 November, 2002.
• 73: Valloppillil, V. Halloween I: Open Source Software, 1998. Available from: http://www.opensource.org/halloween /halloween1.html.
• 74: Valloppillil, V. and Cohen, J. Halloween II: Linux OS Competitive Analysis, 1998. Available from: http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween2.html.
• 75: Vixie, P. Software engineering. in Di Bona, C., Ockman, S. and Stone, M. eds. Open sources: Voices from the open source revolution, O'Reilly, San Francisco, 1999.
• 76: Walsh, J.P. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6 (3). 280--321.
• 77: Wayner, P. Free For All. HarperCollins, New York, 2000.
• 78: Webb, E. and Weick, K.E. Unobtrusive measures in organizational theory: A reminder. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4). 650--659.
• 79: Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (3). 357--381.
• 80: Weisband, S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. in Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. eds. Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, 311--333.
• 81: Young, R. How Red Hat Software stumbled across a new economy model and helped improve an industry. in Di Bona, C., Ockman, S. and Stone, M. eds. Open sources: voices from the open source revolution, O'Reilly, San Francisco, 1999.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Programming teams

General Terms:
Management

Keywords:
collective mind theory, coordination theory, free and open source software, team effectiveness