skip to main content
10.5555/1030453.1030673acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Derivatives and credit risk: enhanced quasi-monte carlo methods with dimension reduction

Published:08 December 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the quasi-Monte Carlo approach for pricing high-dimensional derivative securities has been used widely relative to other competitive approaches such as the Monte Carlo methods. Such success can be, in part, attributed to the notion of effective dimension of the finance problems. In this paper, we provide additional insight on the connection between the effective dimension and the quasi-Monte Carlo method. We also propose a dimension reduction technique which further enhances the quasi-Monte Carlo method for derivative pricing. The efficiency of the proposed method is illustrated by applying it to high-dimensional multi-factor path-dependent derivative securities.

References

  1. Acworth, P., M. Broadie, and P. Glasserman. 1998. A comparison of some Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods for option pricing. In Monte and quasi-Monte-Carlo Methods 1996: Proceedings of a conference at the University of Salzburg, Austria, July 9--12, 1996, ed. H. Niederreiter, P. Hellekalek, G. Larcher and P. Zinterhof. Lecture Notes in Statistics 127. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyle, P. 1977. Options: A Monte Carlo Approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 4:323--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bratley, P., B. Fox, and H. Niederreiter. 1992. Implementation and tests of low-discrepancy sequences. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 2 (3):195--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Caflisch, R., W. Morokoff, and A. Owen. 1997. Valuation of mortgage-backed securities using Brownian bridges to reduce effective dimension. Journal of Computational Finance 1 (1):27--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Joy, C., P. Boyle, and K. S. Tan. 1996. Quasi-Monte Carlo methods in numerical finance. Management Science 42 (6):926--938. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Moskowitz, B. and R. Caflisch. 1996. Smoothness and dimension reduction in quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 23 (8--9):37--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Owen, A. 1995. Randomly permuted (t, m, s)-nets and (t, s)-sequences. In Monte and quasi-Monte-Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing: Proceedings of a conference at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, June 23--25, 1994, ed. H. Niederreiter, and P.-S. Shiue. Lecture Notes in Statistics 106, pages 299--317. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Owen, A. 1998. Latin supercube sampling for very high-dimensional simulations. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 8 (1):71--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Paskov, S. and J. Traub. 1995. Faster valuation of financial derivatives. Journal of Portfolio Management 22 (1):113--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sobol′, I. 1967. The distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. U.S.S.R Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7 (4):86--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Derivatives and credit risk: enhanced quasi-monte carlo methods with dimension reduction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSC '02: Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers
      December 2002
      2143 pages
      ISBN:0780376153
      • General Chair:
      • Jane L. Snowdon,
      • Program Chair:
      • John M. Charnes

      Publisher

      Winter Simulation Conference

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 December 2002

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      WSC '02 Paper Acceptance Rate166of185submissions,90%Overall Acceptance Rate3,413of5,075submissions,67%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader