ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Node ranking in labeled directed graphs
Full text PdfPdf (447 KB)
Source Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Washington, D.C., USA
SESSION: KM-3 (knowledge management): knowledge extraction table of contents
Pages: 597 - 606  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-874-1
Authors
Krishna P. Chitrapura  IBM India Research Lab, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India
Srinivas R. Kashyap  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031171.1031281
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Our work is motivated by the problem of ranking hyper-linked documents for a given query. Given an arbitrary directed graph with edge and node labels, we present a new flow-based model and an efficient method to dynamically rank the nodes of this graph with respect to any of the original labels. Ranking documents for a given query in a hyper-linked document set and ranking of authors/articles for a given topic in a citation database are some typical applications of our method. We outline the structural conditions that the graph must satisfy for our ranking to be different from the traditional <i>PageRank</i>.

We have built a system using two indices that is capable of dynamically ranking documents for any given query. We validate our system and method using experiments on a few datasets: a crawl of the IBM Intranet (12 million pages), a crawl of the <b>www</b> (30 million pages) and the DBLP citation dataset. We compare our method to existing schemes for topic-biased ranking that require a classifier and the traditional <i>PageRank</i>. In these experiments, we demonstrate that our method is well suited for fine-grained ranking and that our method performs better than the existing schemes. We also demonstrate that our system can obtain an improved ranking with very little impact on query time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
E. Amitay, D. Carmel, A. Darlow, M. Herscovici, A. S. L. Lempel, R. Kraft, and J. Zien. Juru at trec 2003 - topic distillation using query-sensitive tuning and cohesiveness filtering. In Proceedings of The Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 2003), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, 2003.
 
2
G. Bhalotia, C. Nakhe, A. Hulgeri, S. Chakrabarti, and S. Sudarshan. Keyword searching and browsing in databases using BANKS. In ICDE, 2002.
3
 
4
P. Bonacich. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1987.
 
5
S. Brin, R. Motwani, L. Page, and T. Winograd. What can you do with a web in your pocket? Data Engineering Bulletin, 21(2):37--47, 1998.
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
N. E. Friedkin. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology, 96(6):1478--1504, 1991.
 
10
T. Haveliwala. Topic-sensitive pagerank: A context-sensitive ranking algorithm for web search. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, July/Aug 2003.
 
11
 
12
C. Hubbell. An input-output approach to clique identification. Sociometry, 28, 1965.
 
13
L. Katz. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18, 1953.
14
 
15
 
16
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
 
17
G. Pinski and F. Narin. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12:297--312, 1976.
 
18
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Krishna P. Chitrapura: colleagues
Srinivas R. Kashyap: colleagues