skip to main content
10.1145/1031607.1031614acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Collaborative knowledge management supporting mars mission scientists

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the design and deployment of a collaborative software tool, designed for and presently in use on the Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) 2003 mission. Two central questions are addressed. Does collaborative content like that created on easels and whiteboards have persistent value? Can groups of people jointly manage collaboratively created content? Based on substantial quantitative and qualitative data collected during mission operations, it remains difficult to conclusively answer the first question while there is some positive support for the second question. The MER mission provides a uniquely rich data set on the use of collaborative tools.

References

  1. Baecker, R.M., Nastos, D., Posner, I.R., and Mawby, K.L. (1993) The User-centred Iterative Design Of Collaborative Writing Software. In Proceedings, InterCHI '93, p. 399--405.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beck, E., Bellotti, V. (1993). Informed Opportunism as Strategy: Supporting Coordination in Distributed Collaborative Writing. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 241--256.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Covi et al, L., Olson, J., and Rocco, E. A room of your own: What do we learn about support of teamwork from assessing teams in dedicated project rooms? (1998) In Cooperative Buildings, N. Streitz, S. Konomi, and H. Burkhardt, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.53--65.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dix, A., Rodden, T., Sommerville, I. (1997). Modeling Versions in Collaborative Work. IEE Proceedings - Software Engineering, 144(4) pp. 195--205.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dourish, P., Edwards W. K., LaMarca A., Salisbury M. (1999) Presto: An Experimental Architecture for Fluid Interactive Document Space. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(2).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Elrod S., Bruce R., Gold R. Goldberg D., Halasz F., Janssen W., Lee D., McCall K., Pedersen E., Pier K., Tang J., Welch B. (1992) Liveboard: A Large Interactive Display Supporting Group Meetings, Presentations and Remote Collaboration. Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.599--607.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fass A., Forlizzi J., Pausch R. (2002) MessyDesk and MessyBoard: two designs inspired by the goal of improving human memory. Proceedings of DIS'02: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques, p.303--311.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fish, R., Kraut, R., and Leland, M. (1988) Quilt: a collaborative tool for cooperative writing. In Proceedings of Conference on Office Information Systems.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ganoe C. (2002) Supporting the collaborative meeting place ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doctoral consortium, v.2 p.546--547.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Greenberg, S. and Marwood, D. (1994). Real time groupware as a distributed system: Concurrency control and its effect on the interface. Proceedings of the ACM CSCW Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 207--217.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Guimbretiere F., Stone M., Winograd T. (2001) Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays Papers: Off the wall Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, p.21--30.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Huang E. M., Mynatt E. D. (2003) Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, v.1 p.49--56.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Karsenty, A., Tronche, C. and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (1993) GroupDesign: shared editing in a heterogeneous environment. USENIX Journal of Computing Systems, 6(2) p.167--195.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch, M. (1994). Design Issues and Model for a Distributed Multi-User Editor. Special Issue on Computer-Supported Collaborative Writing, Volume 3, p 359--378.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lewis, B., Hodges, J. (1988). Shared Books: Collaborative Publication Management for an Office Information System. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Office Automation Systems, p. 197--204.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mark, G. (2002). Extreme collaboration. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 45(6), p.89--93.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mynatt E. D., Edwards W. K, LaMarca A., Igarashi T. (1999) Flatland: New Dimensions in Office Whiteboards. Proceedings of ACM CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, v.1 p.346--353.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S., Chandhok, R., & Morris, J. H. (1990). Issues in the design of computer-support for co-authoring and commenting. Proceeding of Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, p.183--195.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Orlikowski, W. (1992). Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation. Proceeding of Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, p.362--369.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pedersen E. R., McCall K., Moran T. P.,. Halasz F. G. (1993) Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.391--398.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tang, J. and Minneman, S. (1991) Video Draw: A Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing, Proceedings of CHI, p. 315--322.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rochkind, M.J. (1975) The Source Code Control System. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering. SE-1(4): p. 255--265.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Russell D., Trimble J., Wales R. (2002) Two Paths From the Same Place. IBM Make It Easy Conference.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sachweh, S. and W. Schäfer (1995). Version management for tightly integrated software engineering environments. in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering Environments. IEEE Computer Society Press. p. 21--31.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tatar, D., Foster, G. & Bobrow, D. (1991). Design for Conversation: lessons from Cognoter. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34 p. 185--209.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative knowledge management supporting mars mission scientists

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
          November 2004
          644 pages
          ISBN:1581138105
          DOI:10.1145/1031607

          Copyright © 2004 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 November 2004

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CSCW '04 Paper Acceptance Rate53of176submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader