ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Differences in pointing task performance between preschool children and adults using mice
Full text PdfPdf (739 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 11 ,  Issue 4  (December 2004) table of contents
Pages: 357 - 386  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Juan Pablo Hourcade  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Benjamin B. Bederson  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Allison Druin  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
François Guimbretière  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 277,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1035575.1035577
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Several experiments by psychologists and human factors researchers have shown that when young children execute pointing tasks, they perform at levels below older children and adults. However, these experiments have not provided user interface designers with an understanding of the severity or the nature of the difficulties young children have when using input devices. To address this need, we conducted a study to gain a better understanding of 4 and 5 year-old children's use of mice. We compared the performance of thirteen 4 year-olds, thirteen 5 year-olds and thirteen young adults in point-and-click tasks. Plots of the paths taken by the participants show severe differences between adults' and preschool children's ability to control the mouse. We were not surprised then to find age had a significant effect on accuracy, target reentry, and efficiency. We also found that target size had a significant effect on accuracy and target reentry. Measuring movement time at four different times (first entering target, last entering target, pressing button, releasing button) yielded the result that Fitts' law models children well only up to the time they first enter the target. Overall, we found that the difference between the performance of children and adults was large enough to warrant user interface interactions designed specifically for preschool children. The results additionally suggest that children need the most help once they get close to targets.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Albinsson, P. A. and Zhai, S. 2003. High precision touch screen interaction. CHI Letters 5, 1, 105--112.
5
 
6
Card, S. K., English, W. K., and Burr, B. J. 1978. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 601--613.
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
Druin, A. 2002a. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21, 1, 1--25.
12
 
13
Fitts, P. M. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych. 47, 381--391.
 
14
Fry, A. F. and Hale, S. 1996. Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence. Psych. Sci. 7, 4, 237--241.
15
16
17
18
19
20
 
21
International Organization for Standardization. 2000. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)---Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
 
22
Joiner, R., Messer, D., Light, P., and Littleton, K. 1998. It is best to point for young children: A comparison of children's pointing and dragging. Comput. Hum. Behav. 14, 3, 513--529.
 
23
Jones, T. 1991. An empirical study of children's use of computer pointing devices. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 7, 1, 61--76.
 
24
Kail, R. 1986. The impact of extended practice on rate of mental rotation. J. Exper. Child Psych. 42, 378--391.
 
25
Kail, R. 1991. Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolecense. Psych. Bull. 109, 3, 490--501.
 
26
Kail, R. and Park, Y. 1992. Global developmental change in processing time. Merril-Palmer Quarterly 38, 525--541.
 
27
Kerr, R. 1975. Movement control and maturation in elementary-grade children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 41, 151--154.
 
28
King, J. and Alloway, N. 1992. Preschooler's use of microcomputers and input devices. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 8, 4, 451--468.
 
29
King, J. and Alloway, N. 1993. Young children's use of microcomputer input devices. Computers in the Schools 9, 39--53.
 
30
 
31
MacKenzie, I. S. 1992. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 7, 91--139.
32
 
33
Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E. K., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R. A., and Wright, C. E. 1990. Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Aimed Movements: Toward a Theory of Rapid Voluntary Action. In Attention and Performance XIII, M. Jeannerod, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 
34
Miller, L. T. and Vernon, P. A. 1997. Developmental changes in speed of information processing in young children. Develop. Psych. 33, 3, 549--554.
 
35
Revelle, G. L., Druin, A., Platner, M., Bederson, B., Hourcade, J. P., and Sherman, L. 2002. A visual search tool for early elementary science students. J. Sci. Educ. Tech. 11, 1, 49--57.
 
36
 
37
Salmoni, A. W. 1983. A descriptive analysis of children performing Fitts' reciprocal tapping task. J. Human Movement Studies 9, 81--95.
 
38
Salmoni, A. W. and Mcilwain, J. S. 1979. Fitts' reciprocal tapping task: A measure of motor capacity? Perceptual and Motor Skills 49, 403--413.
 
39
Sanders, M. S. and Mccormick, E. J. 1993. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. Seventh Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
 
40
Schellekens, J. M. H., Kalverboer, A. F., and Scholten, C. A. 1984. The micro-structure of tapping movements in children. J. Mot. Behav. 16, 1, 20--39.
 
41
 
42
 
43
Strommen, E. F. 1993. Is it easier to hop or walk? Developmental issues in interface design. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 8, 337--352.
 
44
Strommen, E. F., Revelle, G. L., Medoff, L. M., and Razavi, S. 1996. Slow and steady wins the race? Three-year-old children and pointing device use. Behav. Info. Tech. 15, 1, 57--64.
 
45
Sugden, D. A. 1980. Movement speed in children. J. Motor Behav. 12, 125--132.
 
46
Thomas, J. R. 1980. Acquisition of motor skills: Information processing differences between children and adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 51, 1, 158--173.
 
47
Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
 
48
Wallace, S. A., Newell, K. M., and Wade, M. G. 1978. Decision and response times as a function of movement difficulty in preschool children. Child Development 49, 509--512.
 
49
Welford, A. T. 1968. The Fundamentals of Skill. London: Methuen.
50
 
51
Zhai, S. 2002. On the Validity of Throughput as a Characteristic of Computer Input. IBM Research Report RJ 10253 (A0208--026).
 
52
Zhai, S., Conversy, S., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Guiard, Y. 2003. Human on-line response to target expansion. CHI Letters 5, 1, 177--184.

CITED BY  9
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Juan Pablo Hourcade: colleagues
Benjamin B. Bederson: colleagues
Allison Druin: colleagues
François Guimbretière: colleagues