ReQuEst: Requirements-driven quality estimator

ABSTRACT

Estimating quality of software systems has always been a good practice in software engineering. Presently, quality evaluation techniques are applied only as an afterthought to software design process. However, quality of a software system should be stated based on the end-user's requirement for quality. Based on this observation, this paper proposes an estimation model called ReQuEst (Requirements-driven Quality Estimator). ReQuEst is an attempt to quantitatively estimate the quality of a system being designed from its analysis model. The quality is estimated in terms of adaptability and extendibility which are also important parameters in system design. During requirements analysis, evolving requirements are also analyzed to capture a few quality indicators from them. These indicators are used to compute the requirements for the above parameters from the analysis model. Thus, the analyst can quantitatively specify the quality demands of the system to be designed along with the functional requirements. These quality specifications enable the system designer to precisely design systems meeting the values specified. Further, the model can be used to estimate the maintainability of the system in terms of the above parameters.

REFERENCES

• 1: Pankaj Bhatt , Gautam Shroff , Arun K. Misra, Dynamics of software maintenance, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.29 n.5, September 2004 [doi>10.1145/1022494.1022513]
• 2: R. Geoff Dromey, A Model for Software Product Quality, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.21 n.2, p.146-162, February 1995 [doi>10.1109/32.345830 ]
• 3: Jilles Van Gurp , Jan Bosch , Mikael Svahnberg, On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines, Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'01), p.45, August 28-31, 2001 [doi>10.1109/WICSA.2001.948406]
• 4: Erich Gamma , Richard Helm , Ralph Johnson , John Vlissides, Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1995
• 5: {IEE93} IEEE. IEEE Standard 1219: Standard for Software Maintenance. IEEE Computer Society Press, IEEE 1993.
• 6: {IFP} IFPUG. The International Function Point Users' Group (IFPUG). http://www.ifpug.org/.
• 7: {IFP99} IFPUG. Function Point Counting Practices Manual Release 4.1. Westerville, Ohio: International Function Point Users Group, 1999.
• 8: {ISO00} ISO-14598. Standard for Information Technology - Software Product Evaluation - Part I: General Overview. ISO/IEC ISO 14598, 2000.
• 9: D. Janaki Ram , K. N. Anantharaman , K. N. Guruprasad , M. Sreekanth , S. V. G. K. Raju , A. Ananda Rao, An approach for pattern oriented software development based on a design handbook, Annals of Software Engineering, v.10 n.1-4, p.329-358, 2000
• 10: {JC88} Jones and Capers. Feature Points (Function Point Logic for Real Time and System Software). In IFPUG Fall 1988 Conference, Montreal, QuEbec, Oct., August 1988.
• 11: {KCH+90} K. S. Kang, J. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Nowak, and S. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-90-TR-21 Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, 1990.
• 12: Barbara Kitchenham , Shari Lawrence Pfleeger, Software Quality: The Elusive Target, IEEE Software, v.13 n.1, p.12-21, January 1996 [doi>10.1109/52.476281 ]
• 13: Rubén Prieto-Díaz, Domain analysis: an introduction, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.15 n.2, p.47-54, April 1990 [doi>10.1145/382296.382703]
• 14: Charles R. Symons, Software sizing and estimating: Mk II FPA (Function Point Analysis), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1991

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Software quality assurance (SQA)

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.1 Requirements/Specifications
          Subjects: Elicitation methods (e.g., rapid prototyping, interviews, JAD)
      D.2.8 Metrics
          Subjects: Performance measures

General Terms:
Design, Measurement