skip to main content
article

Climbing onto the shoulders of giants

Published: 23 February 2005 Publication History

Abstract

The "incredible shrinking pipeline" problem has become the euphemism for the dilemma of declining numbers of women seeking bachelor's degrees in a computing discipline. The problem is well recognized, and many have suggested reasons for it. Unfortunately, much of what has been written is based on anecdotal evidence or inferences made from statistical results from small samples of very specific groups in the computing disciplines. There have been few multi-disciplinary approaches to analyze the problem with even fewer attempts to create a model that might explain it. This paper is the end of a beginning. Having received a National Science Foundation grant to study gender-based differences and ethnic and cultural models in the computing disciplines, the principle investigators document the work that has led to launching a nationwide study of the problem to commence in Fall 2004.

References

[1]
Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84 (1977), 191--215.
[2]
Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thoughts and Actions: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
[3]
Barker, L. and Garvin-Doxas, K. Poster: The Effects of Institutional Characteristics on Participation of Women in Computer Science Bachelors Degree Programs. ITiCSE'03, June 30--July 2, 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece, 242.
[4]
Betz, N. and Hackett, G. The Relationship of Mathematics Self-efficacy Expectations to Selection of Science-based College Majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23 (1983) 329--345.
[5]
Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K. and Haller, S. Gender Differences in Computer Science Students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin - inroads, 35, 1 (2003), 49--53.
[6]
Borg, A. What Draws Women to and Keeps Women in Computing? The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 869 (1999), 102--109.
[7]
Camp, T. The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline. CACM, 40, 10 (1997), 103--110.
[8]
Cohoon, J. Departmental Differences Can Point the Way to Improving Female Retention in Computer Science. ACM SIGCSE, 31, 1 (1999) 198--202.
[9]
Cohoon, J. Toward Improving Female Retention in the Computer Science Major. CACM, 44, 5 (2001), 108--114.
[10]
Czetli, S. Business Scene: Why aren't more women in tech fields? The Interactive Edition of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, www.post-gazette.com/pg/pp/03093/171152.stm.
[11]
Dryburgh, H. Underrepresentation of Girls and Women in Computer Science: Classification of 1990s Research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 2 (2000), 181--200.
[12]
Hackett, G. and Betz, N. A Self-efficacy Approach to the Career Development of Women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18 (1981) 326--336.
[13]
Lent, R., Brown, S. and Hackett, G. Toward a Unified Social Cognitive Theory of Career/Academic Interest, Choice and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45 (1994) 79--122.
[14]
Lent, R., Brown, S., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H. and Treistman, D. Social Cognitive Predictors of Engineering Students' Academic Goals: Do Sex or University Type Moderate Predictor-criterion Relations? Proceedings of the 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada, 2003.
[15]
Lent, R., Lopez, F., and Bieschke, K. Mathematics Self-efficacy: Sources and Relation to Science-based Career Choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38 (1991) 424--430.
[16]
Lent, R., Lopez, F., and Bieschke, K. Predicting Mathematics-related Choice and Success Behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42 (1993) 223--236.
[17]
Lopez, A. and Schulte, L. African American Women in the Computing Sciences: A group to be studied. SIGCSE'02, February 27--March 3, 2002, Covington, KY, 87--90.
[18]
Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
[19]
Meeden, L., Newhall, T., Blank, D. and Kumar, D. Using Departmental Surveys to Assess Computing Culture: Quantifying Gender Differences in the Classroom. ITiCSE'03, June 30--July 2, 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece, 188--192.
[20]
Randall, C., Price, B., and Reichgelt, H. Women in Computing Programs: Does the Incredible Shrinking Pipeline Apply to All Computing Programs? ACM SIGCSE Bulleting - inroads, 35, 4 (2003) 55--59.
[21]
Steele, C. Race and the Schooling of Black Americans. The Atlantic Monthly, 4 (1992) 68--78.
[22]
Steele, C. A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance. American Psychologist 52, 6 (1997) 613--629.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Barriers Faced by Women in Software Development ProjectsInformation10.3390/info1010030910:10(309)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Towards gender equality in software engineeringProceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering10.1145/3195570.3195579(10-13)Online publication date: 28-May-2018
  • (2009)Representation of women in CSACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1539024.150890141:1(96-100)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2009
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 37, Issue 1
2005
562 pages
ISSN:0097-8418
DOI:10.1145/1047124
Issue’s Table of Contents
  • cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '05: Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
    February 2005
    610 pages
    ISBN:1581139977
    DOI:10.1145/1047344
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 February 2005
Published in SIGCSE Volume 37, Issue 1

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. culture
  2. ethnicity
  3. gender
  4. social cognitive career theory

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Barriers Faced by Women in Software Development ProjectsInformation10.3390/info1010030910:10(309)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Towards gender equality in software engineeringProceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering10.1145/3195570.3195579(10-13)Online publication date: 28-May-2018
  • (2009)Representation of women in CSACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1539024.150890141:1(96-100)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2009
  • (2009)Representation of women in CSProceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education10.1145/1508865.1508901(96-100)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2009
  • (2006)Large dataset offers view of math and computer self-efficacy among computer science undergraduatesProceedings of the 44th annual ACM Southeast Conference10.1145/1185448.1185484(158-163)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2006
  • (2006)A multi-disciplinary look at the computing disciplinesACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1124706.112142238:1(264-265)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2006
  • (2006)A multi-disciplinary look at the computing disciplinesProceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education10.1145/1121341.1121422(264-265)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2006
  • (2006)Perceived Social Support: Ethnic and Gender Differences in the Computing DisciplinesProceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference10.1109/FIE.2006.322307(9-12)Online publication date: Oct-2006

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media