skip to main content
10.1145/1052220.1052261acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Studying interorganizational systems using multiple perspectives

Published: 25 March 2004 Publication History

Abstract

Interorganizational systems (IOS) are used to facilitate communications and coordination within interorganizational relationships. The different types of interorganizational relationships have different objectives and accordingly require different resources and capabilities. We construct a theoretical model that employs intuitions from multiple theories including political economics, transaction cost economics and the resource-based approach. The model argues that the relationship-specificity of the objectives of the interorganizational relationship (IOR) influences the interorganizational dependence and trust. The dependence and trust affect the investment of relationship-specific IOS related resources and subsequently, combinations of these resources produce relationship-specific IOS related capabilities. These capabilities support the relationship-specific IOR objectives.

References

[1]
Bakos, J. Y. (1991). A strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces. MIS Quarterly, 15(3) 1991. p. 295--310.]]
[2]
Bakos, J. Y. and Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). Information Technology, Incentives and the Optimal Number of Suppliers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2) 1993. p. 37.]]
[3]
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1) 1991. p. 99--120.]]
[4]
Bensaou, M. and Venkatraman, N. (1995). Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: A Comparison Between U.S. and Japanese Automakers. Management Science, 41(9) 1995. p. 1471--1492.]]
[5]
Bensaou, M. and Venkatraman, N. (1996). Interorganizational Relationships and Information Technology: A Conceptual Synthesis and a Research Framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 5 1996. p. 84--91.]]
[6]
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability And Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1) 2000. p. 169--196.]]
[7]
Bradley, S. P. and Nolan, R. L. Capturing Value in the Network Era. in Sense & Respond, Capturing Value in the Network Era, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.]]
[8]
Choudhury, V. (1997). Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems. Information Systems Research, 8(1) 1997, p. 1--24.]]
[9]
Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I. and Dexter, A. S. (2001). Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model. Information Systems Research, 12 2001. p. 304--321.]]
[10]
Doz, Y. L. and Hamel, G. Alliance Advantage. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.]]
[11]
Evans, P. and Wurster, T. S. Blown to Bits. Harvard Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.]]
[12]
Grandori, A. (1997). An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes. Organization Studies, 18(6) 1997, p. 897--925.]]
[13]
Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3) 1991. p. 114--135.]]
[14]
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1) 1995, p. 647--664.]]
[15]
Gulati, R. and Harbir, S. (1998). The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4) 1998. p. 781--814.]]
[16]
Hart, P. and Saunders, C. (1997). Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange. Organization Science, 8(1) 1997. p. 23--42.]]
[17]
Karahannas, M. V. and Jones, M., Interorganizational Systems and Trust in Strategic Alliances. in International Conference in Information Systems, (Charlotte, North Carolina, 1999).]]
[18]
Kumar, N. (1996). The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships. Harvard Business Review, 74(6) 1996. p. 92--106.]]
[19]
Kumar, K., Dissel, H. G. van and Bielli, P. (1998). The merchant of Prato, revisited: toward a third rationality of information systems. Management of Information Systems Quarterly, 22(2) 1998. p. 199--226.]]
[20]
Lindenberg, S. (2000). It takes both trust and lack of mistrust: The workings of cooperation and relational signalling in contractual relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 4 2000. p. 11--33.]]
[21]
Malone, T. W. and Crowston, K., What is Coordination Theory and How can It Help Design Cooperative Work Systems? in The 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, (Los Angeles, California, United States, 1990), ACM Press, 357--370.]]
[22]
Malone, T. W., Yates, J. and Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies: Effects of Information Technologies on Market Structure and Corporate Strategies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6) 1987. p. 484--497.]]
[23]
Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L. and Barney, J. B. (1995). Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4) 1995. p. 487--505.]]
[24]
Miles, R. W. and Snow, C. C. (1992). Causes of failure in network organizations. California Management Review, 34(4) 1992. p. 53--72.]]
[25]
Mishra, A. K., Breaking down organizational boundaries during crisis: the role of mutual trust. In Academy of Management, (Atlanta, 1993).]]
[26]
Nooteboom, B. Inter-Firm Alliances, Analysis and Design. Routledge, London, 1999.]]
[27]
Park, S. H. and Ungson, G. (1997). The effect of partner nationality, organizational dissimilarity, and economic motivation on the dissolution of joint ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 39 1997. p. 279--307.]]
[28]
Penrose, E. T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley, New York, 1959.]]
[29]
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. The External Control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row, New York, 1978.]]
[30]
Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65 1987, p. 43--59.]]
[31]
Powell, T. C. and Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information Technology As Competitive Advantage: The Role of Human, Business And Technology Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5) 1997. p. 375--405.]]
[32]
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3) 1990. p. 79--90.]]
[33]
Prosser, A. and Nickl, A. (1997). The impact of EDI on interorganizational integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 52 1997. p. 269--281.]]
[34]
Ratnasingam, P. P. (2000). The Influence of Power on Trading Partner Trust in Electronic Commerce. Internet Research, 10(1) 2000. p. 56--63.]]
[35]
Ratnasingam, P. P. Interorganizational Trust in Business to Business E-Commerce. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Rotterdam, 2001.]]
[36]
Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M. and Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Develop Long-term Competitiveness Through IT Assets. Sloan Management Review, 38(1) 1996. p. 31--45.]]
[37]
Sako, M. Does Trust Improve Business Performance. In Lane, C. and Buchmann, R. eds. Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.]]
[38]
Subramani, M. R. (2004). How Do Suppliers Benefit From Information Technology Use In Supply Chain Relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1) 2004. p. 45--73.]]
[39]
Subramani, M. R. and Henderson, J. C., A Typology of Hybrid Governance: Proposal and Empirical Validation, in Academy of Management Conference, (Chicago, 1999).]]
[40]
Subramani, M. R. and Venkatraman, N. (2003). Safeguarding Investments in Asymmetric Interorganizational Relationships: Theory and Evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1) 2003. p. 46--62.]]
[41]
Welty, B. and Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2001). Managing Trust and Commitment in Collaborative Supply Chain Relationships. Communications of the ACM, 44(6) 2001. p. 67--73.]]
[42]
Williamson, O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press, New York, 1985.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2010)Building an integrated B2B e‐commerce hub architecture based on SOA and semantic ontologyJournal of Enterprise Information Management10.1108/1741039101108863723:6(775-812)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2010

Index Terms

  1. Studying interorganizational systems using multiple perspectives

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEC '04: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Electronic commerce
    March 2004
    684 pages
    ISBN:1581139306
    DOI:10.1145/1052220
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • ICEC: International Center for Electronic Commerce

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 March 2004

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. IT resources
    2. interorganizational systems
    3. interorganizational trust
    4. resource dependence theory

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 244 submissions, 61%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2010)Building an integrated B2B e‐commerce hub architecture based on SOA and semantic ontologyJournal of Enterprise Information Management10.1108/1741039101108863723:6(775-812)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2010

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media