ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scheduling and optimal register placement for synchronous circuits derived using software pipelining techniques
Full text PdfPdf (302 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 10 ,  Issue 2  (April 2005) table of contents
Pages: 187 - 204  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1084-4309
Authors
Noureddine Chabini  Royal Military College of Canada, Canada
El Mostapha Aboulhamid  Université de Montréal, Canada
Ismaïl Chabini  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA
Yvon Savaria  école Polytechnique de Montréal, QC, Canada
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1059876.1059877
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Data dependency constraints constitute a lower bound P on the minimal clock period of single-phase clocked sequential circuits. In contrast to methods based on basic retiming, clocked sequential circuits with clock period P can always be obtained using software pipelining techniques. Such circuits can be derived by any method that can be framed in the following four-step process: Step 1, determine P; Step 2, compute a valid periodic schedule of the computational elements; Step 3, place registers back to the circuit; Step 4, assign the clock signals to control registers.Methods with polynomial run-time to implement this process are proposed in the literature. They implement these steps sequentially, starting with Step 1. These methods do not know how to optimally place registers which leads to an unnecessary number of registers. In this article, we address the problem of how to simultaneously implement Steps 2 and 3 in order to minimize the total number of registers. We conjecture that the problem is NP-hard in its general form. We formulate the problem for the first time in the literature, and devise a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) to solve it. From this MILP, we derive a linear program to determine approximate solutions to the problem for large general circuits. We show that the proposed approach can handle nonzero clock skew. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the approach and show that significant reductions of the number of registers can be obtained although register sharing is not used. When the schedule is given, the proposed approach provides solutions to the problem of how to place the minimal number of registers in Step 3.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Bennour, I.-E. 1996. Estimation de la performance et méthodes d'allocation dans la synthèse de systèmes numériques. Thèse de doctorat. DIRO, Université de Montréal.
 
4
Bennour, I.-E. and Aboulhamid, E.-M. 1995. Les problèmes d'ordonnancement cycliques dans la synthèse de systèmes numeriques. Technical Report 996 (Oct.). DIRO, Université de Montréal. http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~aboulham/pipeline.pdf.
5
 
6
Boyer, F.-R., Aboulhamid, E.-M., and Savaria, Y. 2001b. Minimizing sensitivity to clock skew variations using level sensitive latches. In Proceedings of European Conference on Circuit Theory and Design (Aug.). Espoo, Finland.
 
7
Boyer, F.-R., Aboulhamid, E.-M., and Savaria, Y. 2001c. An efficient verification method for a class of multi-phase sequential circuits. The 7th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems. Lebanon.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Dasdan, A. and Gupta, R. K. 1998. Faster maximum and minimum mean cycle algorithms for system performance analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst. 17, 10 (Oct.).
11
 
12
13
 
14
Gerez, S.-H., De Groot, S.-M. -H., and Herrmann, O.-E. 1992. A polynomial-time algorithm for the computation of the iteration-period bound in recursive data-flow graphs. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Syst. 39, 1.
15
 
16
ISCAS'89 Benchmark suite. 1996. Department of Computer Science. North Carolina State University. Available at http://www.cbl.ncsu.edu/benchmarks/.
17
 
18
 
19
Khachian, L.-G. 1979. A polynomial algorithm in linear programming. Soviet Math. Doklady 20.
 
20
 
21
 
22
Lawler, E.-L. 1976. Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, NY.
 
23
Legl, C., Vanbekbergen, P., and Wang, A. 1997. Retiming of edge-triggered circuits with multiple clocks and load enables. IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Logic Synthesis (IWLS'97).
 
24
Leiserson, C. E. and Saxe, J. B. 1991. Retiming synchronous circuitry. Algorithmica 6, 5--35.
 
25
 
26
Liu, X., Papaefthymiou, M. C., and Friedman, E. G. 2002. Retiming and clock scheduling for digital circuit optimization. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design 21, 2, 184--203.
 
27
Lockyear, B. and Ebeling, C. 1994. Optimal retiming of level-clocked circuits using symmetric clock schedules. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design of Integr. Circuits Syst. 13 (Sept.), 1097--1109.
 
28
The LP_Solve Tool. Available at ftp://ftp.ics.ele.tue.nl/pub/lp_solve/.
29
 
30
Maheshwari, N. and Sapatnekar, S. S. 1999. Optimizing large multiphase level-clocked circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst. 18, 9 (Sept.) 1249--1264.
 
31
Sapatnekar, S. S. and Deokar, R. B. 1996. Utilizing the retiming-skew equivalence in a practical algorithm for retiming large circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design 15, 10 (Oct.), 1237--1248.
 
32
 
33
Soyata, T., Friedman, E. G., and Mulligan, J. H. 1995. Monotonicity constraints on path delays for efficient retiming with localized clock skew and variable register delay. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (May.), 1748--1751.
 
34
 
35
Tsay, R.-S. 1993. An exact zero-skew clock routing algorithm. IEEE Trans. Comput.- Aided Design 12 (Feb.), 242--249.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Noureddine Chabini: colleagues
El Mostapha Aboulhamid: colleagues
Ismaïl Chabini: colleagues
Yvon Savaria: colleagues