ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimized wafer-probe and assembled package test design for analog circuits
Full text PdfPdf (1.26 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 10 ,  Issue 2  (April 2005) table of contents
Pages: 303 - 329  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1084-4309
Authors
Soumendu Bhattacharya  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Abhijit Chatterjee  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 40,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1059876.1059882
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It is well known that wafer-probe test costs of analog ICs are an order of magnitude less than the corresponding test costs of assembled packages. It is therefore natural to push as much of the testing process into wafer-probe testing as possible to reduce the scope of assembled package testing. However, the signal drive and response observation capabilities during wafer probe testing are limited in comparison to assembled packages. In this article, it is shown that by using band-limited transient test signals, which can be supported by wafer-probe test instrumentation, significant numbers of bad ICs can be detected early during the wafer-probe test. The optimal test stimuli are determined by cooptimizing the wafer-probe and assembled package test waveforms. Overall test costs, including the cost of packaging bad ICs, are minimized and are reduced up to four times. The proposed method has been validated using hardware test data, which were obtained through measurements made on a prototype.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abderrahaman, A., Cerny, E., and Kaminska, B. 1996. CLP-based multi-frequency test generation for analog circuits. J. Electron. Test. 9, 59--73.
 
2
Allen, P. E. and Holberg, D. R. 2002. CMOS Analog Circuit Design, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Bhattacharya, S. and Chatterjee, A. 2002b. Wafer probe and assembled package test co-optimization for minimal test cost. In Proceedings of the International Mixed Signal Test Workshop. 15--20.
 
6
 
7
Brockman, J. B. and Director, S. W. 1989. Predictive subset testing: Optimizing IC parametric performance for quality, cost and yield. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact. 2, 104--113.
 
8
Chaiyaratana, N. and Zalzala, A. M. S. 1997. Recent developments in evolutionary and genetic algorithms: Theory and applications. IEE genetic algorithms in engineering systems: Innovations and applications. Publication No. 446. 270--277. IEE, London, U.K. Web site: http://www.iee.org.
 
9
Friedman, J. H. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat. 19, 1--141.
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
Milor, L. and Viswananathan, V. 1989. Detection of catastrophic faults in analog integrated circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aid. Des. 8, 114--130.
 
14
 
15
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtfheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
 
16
Openbook. 1999. Openbook Cadence Spectre Simulation Handbook. Cadence, San Jose, CA. Web site: http://www.cadence.com.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Soumendu Bhattacharya: colleagues
Abhijit Chatterjee: colleagues