ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Laplace-spectra as fingerprints for shape matching
Full text PdfPdf (263 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling archive
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Solid and physical modeling table of contents
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Pages: 101 - 106  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-015-9
Authors
Martin Reuter  University of Hannover
Franz-Erich Wolter  University of Hannover
Niklas Peinecke  University of Hannover
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 107,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060244.1060256
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces a method to extract fingerprints of any surface or solid object by taking the eigenvalues of its respective Laplace-Beltrami operator. Using an object's spectrum (i.e. the family of its eigenvalues) as a fingerprint for its shape is motivated by the fact that the related eigenvalues are isometry invariants of the object. Employing the Laplace-Beltrami spectra (not the spectra of the mesh Laplacian) as fingerprints of surfaces and solids is a novel approach in the field of geometric modeling and computer graphics. Those spectra can be calculated for any representation of the geometric object (e.g. NURBS or any parametrized or implicitly represented surface or even for polyhedra). Since the spectrum is an isometry invariant of the respective object this fingerprint is also independent of the spatial position. Additionally the eigenvalues can be normalized so that scaling factors for the geometric object can be obtained easily. Therefore checking if two objects are isometric needs no prior alignment (registration/localization) of the objects, but only a comparison of their spectra. With the help of such fingerprints it is possible to support copyright protection, database retrieval and quality assessment of digital data representing surfaces and solids.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Berger, M., Gauduchon, P., and Mazet, E. 1971. Le Spectre d'une Variété Riemannienne. Lecture Notes in Math. 194, Springer Verlag.
4
 
5
Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., and Kimmel, R. 2003. Expression-invariant 3d face recognition. In Proc. AVBPA, Lecture Notes in Comp. Science No. 2688, Springer, 62--69.
 
6
Chavel, I. 1984. Eigenvalues in Riemannian Geometry. Academic Press.
 
7
Chen, H., and Bishop, J. 1997. Delaunay triangulation for curved surfaces. In 6th International Meshing Roundtable Proceedings, 115--127.
 
8
Courant, R., and Hilbert, D. 1993. Methoden der mathematischen Physik. Springer Verlag.
 
9
Cox, T. F., and Cox, M. A. A. 2001. Multidimensional Scaling, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall.
 
10
Descloux, J., and Tolley, M. 1983. An accurate algorithm for computing the eigenvalues of a polygonal membrane. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 39, 37--53.
 
11
Elad, A., and Kimmel, R. 2003. On bending invariant signatures for surfaces. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 25, 10, 1285--1295.
12
 
13
Gordon, C., Webb, D., and Wolpert, S. 1992. Isospectral plane domains and surfaces via Riemannian orbifolds. Invent. Math. 110, 1--22.
 
14
Iyer, N., Jayanti, S., Lou, K., Kalyanaraman, Y., and Ramani, K. 2005. Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends. Computer Aided Design 37, 5, 509--530.
 
15
Kac, M. 1966. Can one hear the shape of a drum? The Amer. Math. Monthly 73, 4 (Apr.), 1--23.
 
16
 
17
Ko, K. H., Maekawa, T., Patrikalakis, N. M., Masuda, H., and Wolter, F.-E. 2003. Shape intrinsic properties for free-form object matching. ASME J. of Comp. and Inf. Sci. in Eng. 3, 4 (Dec.), 325--333.
 
18
Mckean, H., and Singer, I. 1967. Curvature and the eigenvalues of the Laplacian. J. Differential Geometry 1, 43--69.
 
19
Minakshisundaram, S., and Pleijel, A. 1949. Some properties of the eigenfunctions of the Laplace-operator on Riemannian manifolds. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 1, 242--256.
 
20
 
21
Ohbuchi, R., Mukaiyama, A., and Takahashi, S. 2002. A frequency-domain approach to watermarking 3d shapes. Eurographics 21, 3.
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
Strang, G. 1986. Introduction to Applied Mathematics. Wesley-Cambridge Press.
 
26
Tucker, T. M., and Kurfess, T. R. 2003. Newton methods for parametric surface registration. Part I. Theory. Computer-Aided Design 35, 1, 107--114.
 
27
 
28
Wolter, F.-E., Peinecke, N., and Reuter, M. 2004. Geometric modeling of complex shapes and engineering artifacts. In Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, E. Stein, R. de Borst, and T. Hugues, Eds., vol. 1. John Wiley and Sons.
 
29
 
30
Zelditch, S. 1998. The inverse spectral problem for surfaces of revolution. Journal of Differential Geometry 49, 2, 207--264.
 
31
Zienkiewicz, O., and Taylor, R. 2000. The Finite Element Method - Volume 1: The Basis. Butterworth Heinemann.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Martin Reuter: colleagues
Franz-Erich Wolter: colleagues
Niklas Peinecke: colleagues