skip to main content
article

HapticWalker---a novel haptic foot device

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper presents a new haptic locomotion interface, which comprises two programmable foot platforms with permanent foot machine contact. It is designed as a scalable and modular system with unit-by-unit extensibility offering up to six plus one degrees of freedom (DOF) per foot. The basic setup comprises three DOF per foot in the sagittal plane.The machine is based on a rigid hybrid parallel-serial robot kinematics structure. It is equipped with electrical direct drive motors, enabling highly dynamic footplate motions. For contact force measurement, six DOF force/torque sensors are mounted under each foot platform. The system was developed for major application in gait rehabilitation, hence great importance was attached to the incorporation of maximum passive and active security measures for machine users and medical operating personnel.The simulator is able to perform walking trajectories with speeds of up to 5 km/h and 120 steps/min. The system is able to simulate not only slow and “smooth” trajectories like walking on an even floor, up/down staircases, but also foot motions like walking on rough ground or even stumbling or sliding, which require high system dynamics.The machine is controlled by a self-developed full-featured robot control whose soft and hardware is based on up-to-date industrial standards and interfaces. The robot control software is based on RTLinux and runs on an industrial PC. The real-time motion generator includes a newly developed Fourier-based algorithm for the interpolation of natural cyclic walking trajectories. For the implementation of asynchronous events (e.g., sliding, stumbling), the controller comprises especially developed algorithms for automatic motion override adaptation. Different modes of haptic behavior needed for gait rehabilitation, ranging from full foot support during swing phase to completely passive behavior, are currently under development.Intuitive and safe machine operation by nontechnical personnel such as clinicians and physiotherapists is achieved via a separate Windows-based graphical user interface software comprising different window areas for machine programming and operation, real-time off-line simulation and online data visualization in two and three dimensions has been developed as well.A working prototype of the system has been built and tested successfully, including all soft and hardware components. Although the machine has been designed and built for major application in gait rehabilitation, its range of applicability is not limited to this area. It could be integrated into any setup requiring a highly dynamic haptic foot interface and permanent foot machine contact if needed.

References

  1. Albus, J. S., McCain, H. G., and Lumia, R. 1987. NASA/NBS standard reference model for telerobot control system architecture (NASREM). Tech. Rep. 1253, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), MD, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boian, R. F., Kourtev, H., Erickson, K., Deutsch, J. E., Lewis, J. A., and Burdea, G. C. 2003. Dual stewart platform gait rehabilitation system for individuals post stroke. In Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation (IWVR), Piscataway, NJ, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Colombo, G., Joerg, M., Schreier, R., and Dietz, V. 2000. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 37, 6, 313--319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hollerbach, J. M. 2002. Locomotion interfaces. In Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, K. M. Stanney, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 239--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Perry, J. 1992. Gait Analysis. Slack, Thorofare, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Wynne, J. H., and Harkema, S. J. 2002. A robotic tool for studying locomotor adaptation and rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference (EMBC), Houston, TX, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Roston, G. P. and Peurach, T. 1997. A whole body kinesthetic display device for virtual reality applications. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation (ICRA). Albuqerque, NM, USA. 3006--3011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schmidt, H., Hesse, S., and Bernhardt, R. 2004a. Safety concept for robotic gait trainers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference (EMBC), San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Schmidt, H., Sorowka, D., Hesse, S., and Bernhardt, R. 2002. Design of a robotic walking simulator for neurological rehabilitation. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Lausanne, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Schmidt, H., Sorowka, D., Piorko, F., Marhoul, N., and Bernhardt, R. 2004b. Generation of cyclic trajectories for a robotic walking simulator. In Proceedings of ‘Robotik 2004’, Munich, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmidt, H., Sorowka, D., Piorko, F., Marhoul, N., Hesse, S., and Bernhardt, R. 2003. Trajectory generation for gait rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), vol. 1. Daejeon, Korea, 62--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmidt, H., Sorowka, D., Piorko, F., Marhoul, N., Hesse, S., and Bernhardt, R. 2004c. Control system for a robotic walking simulator. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), New Orleans, LA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shiozawa, N., Arima, S., and Makikawa, M. 2004. Virtual walkway system and prediction of gait mode transition for the control of the gait simulator. In Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference (EMBC), San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Winter, D. A. 1990. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Woltring, H. J. 1986. A FORTRAN package for generalized cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv. Eng. Software 8, 2, 104--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yano, H., Kasai, K., Saitou, H., and Iwata, H. 2003. Development of a gait rehabilitation system using a locomotion interface. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 14, 5, 243--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yano, H., Noma, H., Iwata, H., and Miyasato, T. 2000. Shared walk environment using locomotion interfaces. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Philadelphia, PA, USA. 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yoon, J., Ryu, J., and Burdea, G. 2003. Design and analysis of a novel virtual walking machine. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (Haptics'03), Los Angeles, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. HapticWalker---a novel haptic foot device

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          James H. Bradford

          Traditional walking machines used in physiotherapy do little to accommodate the evolving needs of patients progressing through various stages of recovery. This paper describes a therapeutic walking machine that adjusts its function in harmony with two directives: the program selected by the therapist, and the real-time performance of the patient. The success of the system depends on the solution of several interesting user-interface problems: the creation of real-time reactions by the machinery that take into account the latency of the equipment; the development of sensors that measure parameters relevant to the process of walking (such as motion in the sagittal plane); the development of sophisticated models for walking at various speeds, climbing, and even stumbling; and emergency subsystems that ensure patient safety. This paper is one of a series by the authors describing the evolution of their machine. Further work will probably involve increasing the number of degrees of freedom that can be accommodated by the equipment and the underlying computer models. This will be of interest to researchers in the biomechanical field, as well those studying the mechanics of walking for robotic applications. Although the focus of the HapticWalker project is to develop a sophisticated physiotherapy application, there are clear applications to the development of effective human-machine interfaces for industrial exoskeleton devices. Online Computing Reviews Service

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
            ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 2, Issue 2
            April 2005
            112 pages
            ISSN:1544-3558
            EISSN:1544-3965
            DOI:10.1145/1060581
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2005 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 April 2005
            Published in tap Volume 2, Issue 2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader