ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Approximation techniques for utilitarian mechanism design
Full text PdfPdf (196 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Baltimore, MD, USA
SESSION: Session 1B table of contents
Pages: 39 - 48  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-960-8
Authors
Patrick Briest  Dortmund University, Germany
Piotr Krysta  Dortmund University, Germany
Berthold Vöcking  RWTH Aachen, Germany
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060590.1060597
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with the design of efficiently computable incentive compatible, or truthful, mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems with multi-parameter agents. We focus on approximation algorithms for NP-hard mechanism design problems. These algorithms need to satisfy certain monotonicity properties to ensure truthfulness. Since most of the known approximation techniques do not fulfill these properties, we study alternative techniques.Our first contribution is a quite general method to transform a pseudopolynomial algorithm into a monotone FPTAS. This can be applied to various problems like, e.g., knapsack, constrained shortest path, or job scheduling with deadlines. For example, the monotone FPTAS for the knapsack problem gives a very efficient, truthful mechanism for single-minded multi-unit auctions. The best previous result for such auctions was a 2-approximation. In addition, we present a monotone PTAS for the generalized assignment problem with any bounded number of parameters per agent.The most efficient way to solve packing integer programs (PIPs) is LP-based randomized rounding, which also is in general not monotone. We show that primal-dual greedy algorithms achieve almost the same approximation ratios for PIPs as randomized rounding. The advantage is that these algorithms are inherently monotone. This way, we can significantly improve the approximation ratios of truthful mechanisms for various fundamental mechanism design problems like single-minded combinatorial auctions (CAs), unsplittable flow routing and multicast routing. Our approximation algorithms can also be used for the winner determination in CAs with general bidders specifying their bids through an oracle.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
B. Awerbuch, Y. Azar, and S. Plotkin. Throughput-competitive online routing. In Proc. 34th IEEE FOCS, pages 32--40, 1993.
 
5
6
 
7
G. Calinescu. Bounding the payment of approximate truthful mechanisms. In ISAAC, 2004.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
E. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 8, pp. 17--33, 1971.
 
12
 
13
T. Groves. Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41(4), 617--631, 1973.
 
14
M.M. Halldórsson. A survey on independent set approximations. In Proc. APPROX '98, Springer LNCS 1444, pp. 1--14, 1998.
 
15
16
17
 
18
 
19
20
21
 
22
 
23
24
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance, 16, pp. 8--37, 1961.

CITED BY  8
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Patrick Briest: colleagues
Piotr Krysta: colleagues
Berthold Vöcking: colleagues