|
ABSTRACT
Software development methodologies are constantly evolving due to changing technologies and new demands from users. Today's dynamic business environment has given rise to emergent organizations that continuously adapt their structures, strategies, and policies to suit the new environment [12]. Such organizations need information systems that constantly evolve to meet their changing requirements---but the traditional, plan-driven software development methodologies lack the flexibility to dynamically adjust the development process.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Cavaleri, S. and Obloj, K. Management Systems: A Global Perspective. Wadsworth Publishing Company, CA, 1993.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Highsmith, J. Cutter Consortium Reports: Agile Project Management: Principles and Tools 4, 2 (Feb. 2003), Cutter Consortium, Arlington, MA.
|
| |
9
|
MacCormack, A. Product-development practices that work: How Internet companies build software. MIT Sloan Management Review (Winter 2001), 75---84
|
| |
10
|
Orr, K. CMM versus Agile Development: Religious Wars and Software Development. Agile Project Management Executive Report 3, 7 (2002), Cutter Consortium, Arlington, MA.
|
| |
11
|
Sircar, S., Nerur, S.P., and Mahapatra, R. Revolution or Evolution? A Comparison of Object-Oriented and Structured Systems Development Methods. MIS Quarterly 25, 4 (Dec. 2001), 457---471.
|
 |
12
|
|
|