| A multilingual usage consultation tool based on internet searching: more than a search engine, less than QA |
| Full text |
Pdf
(454 KB)
|
| Source
|
International World Wide Web Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web
table of contents
Chiba, Japan
SESSION: Web engineering with semantic annotation
table of contents
Pages: 363 - 371
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-046-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 48, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We present a usage consultation tool, based on Internet searching, for language learners. When a user enters a string of words for which he wants to find usages, the system sends this string as a query to a search engine and obtains search results about the string. The usages are extracted by performing statistical analysis on snippets and then fed back to the user.Unlike existing tools, this usage consultation tool is multi-lingual, so that usages can be obtained even in a language for which there are no well-established analytical methods. Our evaluation has revealed that usages can be obtained more effectively than by only using a search engine directly. Also, we have found that the resulting usage does not depend on the search engine for a prominent usage when the amount of data downloaded from the search engine is increased.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
E. Brill, J. Lin, M. Banko, S. Dumais, and A. Ng. Data-intensive question answering. In TREC, pages 393--400, 2001.
|
| |
2
|
T. Calishain and R. Dornfest. Google Hacks. O'Reilly & Associates, 2003.
|
 |
3
|
Susan Dumais , Michele Banko , Eric Brill , Jimmy Lin , Andrew Ng, Web question answering: is more always better?, Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 11-15, 2002, Tampere, Finland
[doi> 10.1145/564376.564428]
|
 |
4
|
Lev Finkelstein , Evgeniy Gabrilovich , Yossi Matias , Ehud Rivlin , Zach Solan , Gadi Wolfman , Eytan Ruppin, Placing search in context: the concept revisited, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, p.406-414, May 01-05, 2001, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
[doi> 10.1145/371920.372094]
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
GoogleFight. Googlefight : Make a fight with googlefight, 2000. Available at http://www.googlefight.com/.
|
 |
7
|
Taher H. Haveliwala , Aristides Gionis , Dan Klein , Piotr Indyk, Evaluating strategies for similarity search on the web, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, May 07-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
[doi> 10.1145/511446.511502]
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
H. Nakagawa and T. Mori. Automatic term recognition based on statistics of compound nouns and their components. Terminology, 9(2):201--219, 2003.
|
| |
13
|
G. Peters. Geoff's GoogleDuel!, 2002. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/gpeters/cgi-bin/pear/.
|
| |
14
|
G. Reach. Online language populations, 2004. Available at http://www.glreach.com/globstats.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
K. Tanaka-Ishii and H. Nakagawa. Kiwi site, 2004. http://www.kiwi.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/.
|
| |
17
|
Webcorp. Webcorp home page, 1999. Available at http://www.webcorp.org.uk/.
|
| |
18
|
|
|