ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A multilingual usage consultation tool based on internet searching: more than a search engine, less than QA
Full text PdfPdf (454 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Chiba, Japan
SESSION: Web engineering with semantic annotation table of contents
Pages: 363 - 371  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-046-9
Authors
Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii  University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroshi Nakagawa  University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060745.1060800
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a usage consultation tool, based on Internet searching, for language learners. When a user enters a string of words for which he wants to find usages, the system sends this string as a query to a search engine and obtains search results about the string. The usages are extracted by performing statistical analysis on snippets and then fed back to the user.Unlike existing tools, this usage consultation tool is multi-lingual, so that usages can be obtained even in a language for which there are no well-established analytical methods. Our evaluation has revealed that usages can be obtained more effectively than by only using a search engine directly. Also, we have found that the resulting usage does not depend on the search engine for a prominent usage when the amount of data downloaded from the search engine is increased.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
E. Brill, J. Lin, M. Banko, S. Dumais, and A. Ng. Data-intensive question answering. In TREC, pages 393--400, 2001.
 
2
T. Calishain and R. Dornfest. Google Hacks. O'Reilly & Associates, 2003.
3
4
 
5
 
6
GoogleFight. Googlefight : Make a fight with googlefight, 2000. Available at http://www.googlefight.com/.
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
H. Nakagawa and T. Mori. Automatic term recognition based on statistics of compound nouns and their components. Terminology, 9(2):201--219, 2003.
 
13
G. Peters. Geoff's GoogleDuel!, 2002. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/gpeters/cgi-bin/pear/.
 
14
G. Reach. Online language populations, 2004. Available at http://www.glreach.com/globstats.
 
15
 
16
K. Tanaka-Ishii and H. Nakagawa. Kiwi site, 2004. http://www.kiwi.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/.
 
17
Webcorp. Webcorp home page, 1999. Available at http://www.webcorp.org.uk/.
 
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii: colleagues
Hiroshi Nakagawa: colleagues