ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Soundness proof of Z semantics of OWL using institutions
Full text PdfPdf (118 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Special interest tracks and posters of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Chiba, Japan
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages: 1048 - 1049  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-051-5
Authors
Dorel Lucanu  A.I. Cuza University, Romania
Yuan Fang Li  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Jin Song Dong  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062745.1062862
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The correctness of the Z semantics of OWL is the theoretical foundation of using software engineering techniques to verify Web ontologies. As OWL and Z are based on different logical systems, we use institutions to represent their underlying logical systems and use institution morphisms to prove the correctness of the Z semantics for OWL DL.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
J. Goguen and G. Rosu. Institution morphisms. Formal Aspects of Computing, 2002.
 
4
 
5
D. Lucanu, Y. F. Li, and J. S. Dong. Web Ontology Verification and Analysis in the Z Framework. Technical Report TR 05-01, University "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" of Iasi, Romania, January 2005. http://thor.info.uaic.ro/~tr/tr05-01.ps.
 
6
P. F. Patel-Schneider and I. Horrocks (editors).OWL: Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/direct.html.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Dorel Lucanu: colleagues
Yuan Fang Li: colleagues
Jin Song Dong: colleagues