skip to main content
article

Traffic matrices: balancing measurements, inference and modeling

Published:06 June 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Traffic matrix estimation is well-studied, but in general has been treated simply as a statistical inference problem. In practice, however, network operators seeking traffic matrix information have a range of options available to them. Operators can measure traffic flows directly; they can perform partial flow measurement, and infer missing data using models; or they can perform no flow measurement and infer traffic matrices directly from link counts. The advent of practical flow measurement makes the study of these tradeoffs more important. In particular, an important question is whether judicious modeling, combined with partial flow measurement, can provide traffic matrix estimates that are signficantly better than previous methods at relatively low cost. In this paper we make a number of contributions toward answering this question. First, we provide a taxonomy of the kinds of models that may make use of partial flow measurement, based on the nature of the measurements used and the spatial, temporal, or spatio-temporal correlation exploited. We then evaluate estimation methods which use each kind of model. In the process we propose and evaluate new methods, and extensions to methods previously proposed. We show that, using such methods, small amounts of traffic flow measurements can have significant impacts on the accuracy of traffic matrix estimation, yielding results much better than previous approaches. We also show that different methods differ in their bias and variance properties, suggesting that different methods may be suited to different applications.

References

  1. S. Bhattacharyya, C. Diot, J. Jetcheva, and N. Taft. Geographical and Temporal Characteristics of Inter-POP Flows: View from a Single POP. In European Transactions on Telecommunications, February 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Cao, D. Davis, S. VanderWeil, and B. Yu. Time-Varying Network Tomography: Router Link Data. Journal of the the American Statistical Association, 95(452), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cisco. NetFlow Services Solutions Guide, July 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Gunnar, M. Johansson, and T. Telkamp. Traffic Matrix Estimation on a Large IP Backbone - A Comparison on Real Data. In ACM Internet Measurement Conference, Taormina, Italy, October 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Lakhina, K. Papagiannaki, M. Crovella, C. Diot, E. Kolaczyk, and N. Taft. Structural Analysis of Network Traffic Flows. In ACM Sigmetrics, New York, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Medina, N. Taft, K. Salamatian, S. Bhattacharyya, and C. Diot. Traffic Matrix Estimation: Existing Techniques and New Directions. In ACM SIGCOMM, Pittsburgh, USA, Aug. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Nucci, R. Cruz, N. Taft, and C. Diot. Design of IGP Link Weight Changes for Estimation of Traffic Matrices. In IEEE Infocom, Hong Kong, March 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K. Papagiannaki, N. Taft, and A. Lakhina. A Distributed Approach to Measure Traffic Matrices. In ACM Internet Measurement Conference, Taormina, Italy, October 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Soule, A. Nucci, E. Leonardi, R. Cruz, and N. Taft. How to Identify and Estimate the Largest Traffic Matrix Elements in a Dynamic Environment. In ACM Sigmetrics, New York, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Soule, K. Salamatian, A. Nucci, and N. Taft. Traffic Matrix Tracking using Kalman Filtering. LIP6 Research Report RP-LIP6-2004-07-10, LIP6, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Y. Vardi. Estimating Source-Destination Traffic Intensities from Link Data. Journal of the the American Statistical Association, March 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Varghese and C. Estan. The Measurement Manifesto. In HotNets-II, Nov. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Zhang, M. Roughan, N. Duffield, and A. Greenberg. Fast Accurate Computation of Large-Scale IP Traffic Matrices from Link Loads. In ACM Sigmetrics, San Diego, CA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Zhang, M. Roughan, C. Lund, and D. Donoho. An Information Theoretic Approach to Traffic Matrix Estimation. In ACM SIGCOMM, Karlsruhe, Germany, August 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Traffic matrices: balancing measurements, inference and modeling

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
        ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 33, Issue 1
        Performance evaluation review
        June 2005
        417 pages
        ISSN:0163-5999
        DOI:10.1145/1071690
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        • cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGMETRICS '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
          June 2005
          428 pages
          ISBN:1595930221
          DOI:10.1145/1064212

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 June 2005

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader