skip to main content
10.1145/1065385.1065398acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Information synthesis: a new approach to explore secondary information in scientific literature

Published:07 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Advances in both technology and publishing practices continue to increase the quantity of scientific literature that is available electronically. In this paper, we introduce the Information Synthesis process, a new approach that enables scientists to visualize, explore, and resolve contradictory findings that are inevitable when multiple empirical studies explore the same natural phenomena. Central to the Information Synthesis approach is a cyber-infrastructure that provides a scientist with both primary and secondary information from an article and structured information resources. To demonstrate this approach, we have developed the Multi-User, Information Extraction for Information Synthesis (METIS) System. METIS is an interactive system that automates critical tasks within the Information Synthesis process. We provide two case-studies that demonstrate the utility of the Information Synthesis approach.

References

  1. Alderson, P., Green, S. and Higgins, J.P.T. (eds.). Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 {Updated March 2004}. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, E. and Olkin, I. Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282 (7). 634--635, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Atkinson, D.R., Furlong, M.J. and Wampold, B.E. Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations and the scientific process: Is there a statistically significant relationship? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29. 189--194, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg, C. and Berlin, J. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (151). 419--463, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, C. Information Synthesis: A Mixed-Initiative Meta-Analytic Approach to Facilitate Knowledge Discovery from Scientific Text School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Centers for Disease Control. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, H.T.O. and Crombie, I.K. What is a Meta-Analysis? Hayward Medical Communications, 1 (8). 1--8, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies, H.T.O. and Crombie, I.K. What is a Systematic Review? Hayward Medical Communications, 1 (5). 1--5, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, S., Mirick, D.K. and Stevens, R.G. Residential Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Breast Cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155 (5). 446--454, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DerSimonian, R. and Laird, N. Meta-Analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7. 177--188, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Easterbrook, P.J., Berlin, J.A., Gopalan, R. and Matthews, D.R. Publication bias in research. Lancet, 337. 867--872, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellison, R.C., Zhang, Y., McLennan, C.E. and Rothman, K.J. Exploring the Relation of Alcohol Consumption to Risk of Breast Cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154 (8). 740--747, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunter, J.E. and Schmidt, F.L. Methods of Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Khuder, S.A., Mutgi, A.B. and Nugent, S. Smoking and breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Rev Environ Health, 16 (4). 253--261, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Light, K. The Cochrane Library - Self Training Guide and Notes 2003 Issue 4. Center for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lipsey, M.W. and Wilson, D.B. Practical Meta-Analysis. Sage, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Longnecker, M.P., Berlin, J.A., Orza, M.J. and Chalmers, T.C. A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer. JAMA, 260 (5). 652--656, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment. The Health Technology Assessment Programme Information Sheet 1: An overview of the programme, Version 1.0, Southhampton, UK, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. National Library of Medicine. UMLS Metathesaurus Fact Sheet Fact Sheet, National Library of Medicine, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Petrosino, A. Lead Authors of Cochrane Reviews: Survey Results. Report to the Campbell Collaboration, University of Pennsylvania, Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Singletary, K.W. and Gapstur, S.M. Alcohol and breast cancer: review of epidemiologic and experimental evidence and potential mechanisms. JAMA, 286 (17). 2143--2151, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sutton, A.J., Abrams, K.R., Jones, D.R., Sheldon, T.A. and Song, F. (eds.). Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. York Publishing Services, York, UK, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tengs, T. and Osgood, N.D. The Link between Smoking and Impotence : Two Decades of Evidence. Preventive Medicine, 32 (6). 447--452, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Thornton, A. and Lee, P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53. 207--216, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Information synthesis: a new approach to explore secondary information in scientific literature

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  JCDL '05: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
                  June 2005
                  450 pages
                  ISBN:1581138768
                  DOI:10.1145/1065385
                  • General Chair:
                  • Mary Marlino,
                  • Program Chairs:
                  • Tamara Sumner,
                  • Frank Shipman

                  Copyright © 2005 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 7 June 2005

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader