ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Natural selection in peer-to-peer streaming: from the cathedral to the bazaar
Full text PdfPdf (175 KB)
Source International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video archive
Proceedings of the international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video table of contents
Stevenson, Washington, USA
SESSION: Peer to peer table of contents
Pages: 93 - 98  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-987-X
Authors
Vivek Shrivastava  University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Suman Banerjee  University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1065983.1066006
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Success of peer-to-peer applications in many cases is attributed to user altruism, where a user contributes some of its own resources to facilitate performance of other users. This observation has been corroborated with some experimental evidence. In this paper we make a first attempt to demonstrate that there are many scenarios where peer-to-peer resource sharing is a natural behavior that selfish users can use to improve their own performance. In particular we examine such natural incentives that exist in a streaming media application which lead such greedy users to cooperate and share resources with each other in forming an efficient overlay multicast tree. We define a freestyle Bazaar environment in which streaming media receivers interact with each other and cooperatively construct an overlay tree for improving their perception of media streams from a single server. Through simulations we demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed environment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
A. Bharambe, S. Rao, V. Padmanabhan, S. Seshan, and H. Zhang. The impact of heterogeneous bandwidth constraints on dht-based multicast protocols. In International Workshop on P2P Systems, 2005.
3
 
4
M. Castro, P. Druschel, A. Kermarrec, and A. Rowstron. SCRIBE: A large-scale and decentralized application-level multicast infrastructure. IEEE JSAC, 2002.
5
 
6
B. Cohen. Incentives build robustness in bittorrent. In Workshops on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
 
7
Courcoubetis and Antoniadis. Market models for p2p content distribution. In First International Workshop on Agents and Peer-To-Peer Computing (AP2PC), 2002.
 
8
A. Habib and J. Chuang. Incentive mechanism for peer-to-peer media streaming. In International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS), 2004.
9
10
 
11
J. Jannotti, D. K. Gifford, K. L. Johnson, M. F. Kaashoek, and J. W. O'Toole, Jr. Overcast: Reliable multicasting with an overlay network. In ACM OSDI, 2000.
12
 
13
myns(p2p) Simulator. www.cs.wisc.edu/~suman/research/myns/index.html.
 
14
 
15
 
16
S. C. V. Vishnumurthy and E. G. Sirer. Karma: A secure economic framework for p2p resource sharing. In Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
 
17
S. Yuen and B. Li. Strategyproof mechanisms for dynamic multicast tree formation in overlay networks. In IEEE Infocom, Mar. 2005.
 
18
E. W. Zegura, K. L. Calvert, and S. Bhattacharjee. How to model an internetwork. In IEEE Infocom, 1996.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Vivek Shrivastava: colleagues
Suman Banerjee: colleagues