|
ABSTRACT
Many healthcare organizations have transited from their old and disparate business models based on ink and paper to a new, consolidated ones based on electronic patient records. There are significant demands on secure mechanisms for collaboration and data sharing among clinicians, patients and researchers through clinical information systems. In order to fulfil the high demands of data protection in such systems, we believe that access control policies play an important role to reduce the risks to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of medical data. In this paper, we attempt to formally specify access control policies in clinical information systems which are highly dynamic and complex environments. We leverage characteristics of temporal linear first-order logic to cope with dynamic access control policies in clinical information systems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
EU, Directive on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Directive 95/46/EC. http://www.privacy.org/pi/intl_orgs/ec/eudp.html, 1995.
|
| |
7
|
D. Ferraiolo, D. Gilbert, and N. Lynch, An examination of federal and commercial access control policy needs, Proc. of the NIST-NCSC Nat. (U. S.) Comp. Security Conference, 1993, pp. 107--116.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information, Gesundheitskarte. http://www.dimdi.de/de/ehealth/karte/index.htm, 2004.
|
| |
10
|
M. Gasser and E. McDermott, An architecture for practical delegation in a distributed system, Proc. IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, 1990, pp. 20--30.
|
 |
11
|
Christos K. Georgiadis , Ioannis Mavridis , George Pangalos , Roshan K. Thomas, Flexible team-based access control using contexts, Proceedings of the sixth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, p.21-27, May 2001, Chantilly, Virginia, United States
[doi> 10.1145/373256.373259]
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
V. D. Gligor, S. I. Gavrila, and D. Ferraiolo, On the formal definition of separation-of-duty policies and their composition, 1998 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SSP '98), IEEE, May 1998, pp. 172--185.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Zohar Manna , Nikolaj Bjørner , Anca Browne , Edward Y. Chang , Michael Colón , Luca de Alfaro , Harish Devarajan , Arjun Kapur , Jaejin Lee , Henny Sipma , Tomás E. Uribe, STeP: The Stanford Temporal Prover, Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference CAAP/FASE on Theory and Practice of Software Development, p.793-794, May 22-26, 1995
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
T. Mossakowski, M. Drouineaud, and K. Sohr, A temporal-logic extension of role-based access control covering dynamic separation of duties, Proc. of TIME-ICTL 2003), Cairns, Queensland, Australia, July 8--10 2003.
|
| |
19
|
M. J. Nash and K. R. Poland, Some conundrums concerning separation of duty, Proc. IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, 1990, pp. 201--207.
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
|