ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Heuristics, optimizations, and parallelism for protein structure prediction in CLP(FD)
Full text PdfPdf (383 KB)
Source International Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming table of contents
Lisbon, Portugal
Pages: 230 - 241  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-090-6
Authors
Alessandro Dal Palù  Università di Udine
Agostino Dovier  Università di Udine
Enrico Pontelli  New Mexico State University
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1069774.1069796
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The paper describes a constraint-based solution to the protein folding problem on face-centered cubic lattices---a biologically meaningful approximation of the general protein folding problem. The paper improves the results presented in [15] and introduces new ideas for improving efficiency: (i) proper reorganization of the constraint structure; (ii) development of novel, both general and problem-specific, heuristics; (iii) exploitation of parallelism. Globally, we obtain a speed up in the order of 60 w.r.t. [15]. We show how these results can be employed to solve the folding problem for large proteins containing subsequences whose conformation is already known.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Agarwala et al. Local rules for protein folding on a triangular lattice and generalized hydrophobicity in the HP model. J. of Computational Biology, pages 275--296, 1997.
 
2
K. R. Apt. Principles of constraint programming. Cambridge University press, 2003.
 
3
 
4
 
5
R. Backofen and S. Will. A Constraint-Based Approach to Structure Prediction for Simplified Protein Models that Outperforms Other Existing Methods. ICLP, 2003, Springer Verlag.
 
6
H. M. Berman et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28:235--242, 2000. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/.
 
7
M. Berrera, H. Molinari, and F. Fogolari. Amino acid empirical contact energy definitions for fold recognition in the space of contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics, 4(8), 2003.
 
8
R. Bonneau and D. Baker. Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 30:173--89, 2001.
 
9
B. R. Brooks et al. Charmm: A program for macromolecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem., 4:187--217, 1983.
 
10
 
11
A. M. Cheadle et al. ECLiPSe: An Introduction. Technical Report IC-Parc 03--1, IC-Parc, 2003.
 
12
D. Clark, J. Shirazi, and C. Rawlings. Protein topology prediction through constraint-based search and the evaluation of topological folding rules. Protein Engineering, 4:752--760, 1991.
 
13
P. Clote and R. Backofen. Computational Molecular Biology: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
14
 
15
A. Dal Palù, A. Dovier, and F. Fogolari. Constraint logic programming approach to protein structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 5(186), 2004.
 
16
A. Dal Palù, A. Dovier, and F. Fogolari. Protein folding in CLP(FD) with empirical contact energies. In Recent Advances in Constraints, Springer Verlag, 2004.
 
17
F. Fogolari et al. Modeling of polypeptide chains as C-α chains, C-α chains with C-β, and C-α chains with ellipsoidal lateral chains. Biophysical Journal, 70:1183--1197, 1996.
 
18
S. Forman. Torsion Angle Selection and Emergent Non-local Secondary Structure in Protein Structure Prediction. PhD thesis, U. of Iowa, 2001.
19
 
20
W. Hart and S. Israil. Fast protein folding in the hydrophobic-hytrophilic model within three-eighths of optimal. J. of Computational Biology, pages 53--96, 1996.
 
21
S. Miyazawa and R. L. Jernigan. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. of Molecular Biology, 256(3):623--644, 1996.
 
22
 
23
Committee on Mathematical Challenges from Computational Chemistry. National Research Council, 1995.
 
24
D. Qiu, P. Shenkin, F. Hollinger, and W. Still. The gb/sa continuum model for solvation. A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate born radii. J. Phys. Chem., 101:3005--3014, 1997.
 
25
G. Raghunathan and R. L. Jernigan. Ideal architecture of residue packing and its observation in protein structures. Protein Science, 6:2072--2083, 1997.
 
26
B. Rost and C. Sander. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol., 232:584--599, 1993.
 
27
K. Simons et al. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999, 3:171--176.
 
28
 
29
J. Skolnick and A. Kolinski. Reduced models of proteins and their applications. Polymer, 45:511--524, 2004.
 
30
Swedish Institute for Computer Science. Sicstus Prolog. http://www.sics.se/sicstus/.
 
31
L. Toma and S. Toma. Folding simulation of protein models on the structure-based cubo-octahedral lattice with contact interactions algorithm. Protein Science, 8:196--202, 1999.
 
32
M.L.G. William and D. Harvey. Limited discrepancy search. IJCAI, pages 607--615, Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alessandro Dal Palù: colleagues
Agostino Dovier: colleagues
Enrico Pontelli: colleagues