| Efficient dependency tracking for relevant events in shared-memory systems |
| Full text |
Pdf
(224 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
table of contents
Las Vegas, NV, USA
SESSION: Verification and security
table of contents
Pages: 19 - 28
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-994-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 51, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In a concurrent system with N processes, vector clocks of size N are used for tracking dependencies between the events. Using vectors of size N leads to scalability problems. Moreover, association of components with processes makes vector clocks cumbersome and inefficient for systems with a dynamic number of processes. We present a class of logical clock algorithms, called chain clock, for tracking dependencies between relevant events based on generalizing a process to any chain in the computation poset. Chain clocks are generally able to track dependencies using fewer than N components and also adapt automatically to systems with dynamic number of processes. We compared the performance of Dynamic Chain Clock (DCC) with vector clock for multithreaded programs in Java. With 1% of total events being relevant events, DCC requires 10 times fewer components than vector clock and the timestamp traces are smaller by a factor of 100. Although DCC requires shared data structures, it is still 10 times faster than vector clock in our experiments.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
A. Agarwal and V. K. Garg. Chain clocks: Efficient dependency tracking for shared-memory systems. Technical report, University of Texas at Austin, 2004. Available as "http://maple.ece.utexas.edu/TechReports/2004/TR-PDS-2004-005.ps".
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
R. Baldoni and G. Melideo. Tradeoffs in message overhead versus detection time in causality tracking. Technical Report 06-01, Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Univ. of Rome, 2000.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
B. A. Davey and H. A. Priestley. Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
C. J. Fidge. Timestamps in message-passing systems that preserve the partial ordering. Proc. of the 11th Australian Computer Science Conference, 10(1):56--66, Feb 1988.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
V. K. Garg and B. Waldecker. Detection of unstable predicates. In Proc. of the Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Debugging, Santa Cruz, CA, May 1991. ACM/ONR.
|
| |
14
|
H. A. Kierstead. Recursive colorings of highly recursive graphs. Canad. J. Math, 33(6):1279--1290, 1981.
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
F. Mattern. Virtual time and global states of distributed systems. In Parallel and Distributed Algorithms: Proc. of the Int'l Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Algorithms, pages 215--226, 1989.
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
D. B. West. The Art of Combinatorics Volume III: Order and Optimization. Preprint edition.
|
|