ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Defocus-aware leakage estimation and control
Full text PdfPdf (190 KB)
Source International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceedings of the 2005 international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Power grid, thermal, and leakage issues table of contents
Pages: 263 - 268  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-137-6
Authors
Andrew B. Kahng  University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA
Swamy Muddu  University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA
Puneet Sharma  University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1077603.1077665
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Leakage power is one of the most critical issues for ultra-deep submicron technology. Subthreshold leakage depends exponentially on linewidth, and consequently variation in linewidth translates to a large leakage variation. A significant fraction of variation in linewidth occurs due to systematic variations involving focus and pitch. In this paper we propose a new leakage estimation methodology that accounts for focus-dependent variation in linewidth. The ideas presented in this paper significantly improve leakage estimation and can be used in existing leakage reduction techniques to improve their efficacy. We modify the previously proposed gate length biasing technique of [9] to consider systematic variations in linewidth and further reduce leakage power. Our method reduces the leakage spread between worst and best process corners by up to 62%. Defocus awareness improves leakage reduction from gate length biasing by up to 7%


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Berkeley predictive technology model. http://www-device.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ptm.
2
3
 
4
Y. Cao, T. Sato, M. Orshansky, D. Sylvester and C. Hu. New Paradigm of Predictive MOSFET and Interconnect Modeling for Early circuit Design. In Proc. Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 201--204, 2000.
 
5
R. Choudhury. Handbook of Microlithography and Micromachining Volume:1. In SPIE Press Monograph, 2002.
 
6
J. Fishburn and A. Dunlop. Tilos: A posynomial programming approach to transistor-sizing. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Computer Aided Design, pp. 326--328, 1985.
 
7
D. G. Flagello, H. van der Laan, J. van Schoot, I. Bouchoms and B. Geh. Understanding systematic and random cd variations using predictive modelling techniques. In SPIE Conf. Optical Microlithography XII, pp. 162--175, 1999.
8
9
 
10
 
11
B. Lee. Modeling of Chemical Mechanical Polishing for Shallow Trench Isolation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
 
12
D. O. Ouma, D. S. Boning, J. E. Chung, W. G. Easter, V. Saxena, S. Misra and A. Crevasse. Characterization and Modeling of Oxide Chemical Mechanical Polishing Using Planarization Length and Pattern Density. In IEEE Tran. on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 15(2), pp. 232--244, 2002.
13
 
14


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew B. Kahng: colleagues
Swamy Muddu: colleagues
Puneet Sharma: colleagues