ABSTRACT
This paper describes the use of a large screen virtual environment to induce the perception of translational and rotational self-motion. We explore two aspects of this problem. Our first study investigates how the level of visual immersion (seeing a reference frame) affects subjective measures of vection. For visual patterns consistent with translation, self-reported subjective measures of self-motion were increased when the floor and ceiling were visible outside of the projection area. When the visual patterns indicated rotation, the strength of the subjective experience of circular vection was unaffected by whether or not the floor and ceiling were visible. We also found that circular vection induced by the large screen display was reported subjectively more compelling than translational vection. The second study we present describes a novel way in which to measure the effects of displays intended to produce a sense of vection. It is known that people unintentionally drift forward if asked to run in place while blindfolded and that adaptations involving perceived linear self-motion can change the rate of drift. We showed for the first time that there is a lateral drift following perceived rotational self-motion and we added to the empirical data associated with the drift effect for translational self-motion by exploring the condition in which the only self-motion cues are visual.
- Anstis, S. M. 1995. Aftereffects from jogging. Experimental Brain Research 103, 476--478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brandt, T., Dichgans, J., and Koenig, E. 1973. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research 16, 476--491.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dichgans, J., and Brandt, T. 1978. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In Perception, R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber, Eds., vol. VIII of Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer, 756--804.Google Scholar
- Durgin, F. H., Banton, T. A., Walley, K., Proffitt, D. R., Steve, J., and Lewis, J. 2000. Locomotion recalibration in a virtual world. Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science 41, 4.Google Scholar
- Durgin, F. H., Pelah, A., Fox, L. F., Lewis, J. Y., Kane, R., and Walley, K. A. in press. Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: More than meets the eye. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.Google Scholar
- Fischer, M. H., and Kornmüller, A. E. 1930. Optokinetisch ausgelöste Bewegungswahrnehmung und optokinetischer Nystagmus {Optokinetically induced motion perception and optokinetic nystagmus}. Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie, 273--308.Google Scholar
- Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., and Zikovitz, D. C. 2000. Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion. Experimental Brain Research 135, 1 (Nov.), 12--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hettinger, L. J. 2002. Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In Handbook of Virtual Environments, K. M. Stanney, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, ch. 23, 471--492.Google Scholar
- Howard, I. P., and Heckmann, T. 1989. Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of 2 competing visual displays. Perception 18, 5, 657--665.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Howard, I. P., and Howard, A. 1994. Vection - the contributions of absolute and relative visual-motion. Perception 23, 7, 745--751.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lepecq, J. C., Jouen, F., and Dubon, D. 1993. The effect of linear vection on manual aiming at memorized directions of stationary targets. Perception 22, 1, 49--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ohmi, M., Howard, I. P., and Landolt, J. P. 1987. Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception 16, 5, 17--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., and Epstein, W. 2003. The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science 14, 106--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Riecke, B. E., Von Der Heyde, M., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2004. Spatial updating in real and virtual environments - contribution and interaction of visual and vestibular cues. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, (APGV), 9--17. Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2764. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Avraamides, M. N., Von Der Heyde, M., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2005. Scene consistency and spatial presence increase the sensation of self-motion in virtual reality. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, (APGV). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2005. Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. In IEEE VR2005, www.vr2005.org, 131--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riecke, B. E., Von Der Heyde, M., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2005. Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP). (accepted manuscript). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rieser, John, J., Pick, Herbert, L., Ashmead, Daniel, H., and Garing, Anne, E. 1995. Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psycholgy: Human Perception and Performance 21, 3, 480--497.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schulte-Pelkum, J., Riecke, B. E., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2004. Vibrational cues enhance believability of ego-motion simulation. In International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF). Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2766.Google Scholar
- Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M., Steed, A., Slater, M., and Brooks, F. 1999. Walking: Virtual walking: Flying, in virtual environments. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH99 (Los Angeles, CA, August 11--13) Computer Graphics Annual Conference Series, 359--364. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Der Steen, F. A. M., and Brockhoff, P. T. M. 2000. Induction and impairment of saturated yaw and surge vection. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 1 (Jan.), 89--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warren, R., and Wertheim, A. H., Eds. 1990. Perception & Control of Self-Motion. Erlbaum, New Jersey, London.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Measuring vection in a large screen virtual environment
Recommendations
Technical Section: Circular, linear, and curvilinear vection in a large-screen virtual environment with floor projection
Vection is defined as the compelling sensation of illusory self-motion elicited by a moving sensory, usually visual, stimulus. This paper presents collected introspective data, user discomfort and perceived speed data for the experience of linear, ...
Reflex-Based navigation by inducing self-motion perception with head-mounted vection display
ACE'12: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Advances in Computer EntertainmentCurrently, many AR/MR researches and applications are based on visual information presentation with narrow field of view HMD. For example, some AR/MR systems navigate users by showing visual information signs or notification messages as needed. However, ...
Simple user-generated motion cueing can enhance self-motion perception (Vection) in virtual reality
VRST '06: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technologyDespite amazing advances in the visual quality of virtual environ-ments, affordable-yet-effective self-motion simulation still poses a major challenge. Using a standard psychophysical paradigm, the effectiveness of different self-motion simulations was ...
Comments