|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
Establishing pairwise keys for each pair of neighboring sensors is the first concern in securing communication in sensor networks. This task is challenging because resources are limited. Several random key predistribution schemes have been proposed, but they are appropriate only when sensors are uniformly distributed with high density. These schemes also suffer from a dramatic degradation of security when the number of compromised sensors exceeds a threshold. In this paper, we present a group-based key predistribution scheme, GKE, which enables any pair of neighboring sensors to establish a unique pairwise key, regardless of sensor density or distribution. Since pairwise keys are unique, security in GKE degrades gracefully as the number of compromised nodes increases. In addition, GKE is very efficient since it requires only localized communication to establish pairwise keys, thus significantly reducing the communication overhead. Our security analysis and performance evaluation illustrate the superiority of GKE in terms of resilience, connectivity, communication overhead and memory requirement. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
Keywords:
REVIEW
"Alessandro Berni : Reviewer"
Sensor networks offer a cost-effective approach to many civilian, homeland security, and military applications. Their wireless communication component plays a key role, not only in reporting specific events to a control center, but also in enablin
more...
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||