ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using the UML 2.0 activity diagram to model agent plans and actions
Full text PdfPdf (433 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
The Netherlands
SESSION: Papers: AOSE II table of contents
Pages: 594 - 600  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-093-0
Authors
Viviane Torres da Silva  Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro / RJ, Brazil
Ricardo Choren Noya  Military Institute of Engineering, Praia Vermelha - Rio de Janeiro / RJ, Brazil
Carlos J. P. de Lucena  Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro / RJ, Brazil
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 187,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082473.1082563
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The behavior of an agent is defined through the specification of plans and actions. Agents have a set of plans that are selected to be executed according to their goals (and other mental state information). In this paper, we propose the use of UML 2.0 activity diagrams to model agent plans and actions. We consider a plan to be an activity. Both plans and activities are composed of actions and define the action execution sequence. By using some features available in the UML 2.0 activity diagrams and defining some new ones, we demonstrate how these diagrams can be applied to model agent plans and actions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
M. Kang, K. Taguchi. "Modelling Mobile Agent Applications by Extended UML Activity Diagram" ICEIS (4), 519--522, 2004.
 
5
 
6
 
7
J. Odell, H. Parunak and B. Bauer. "Extending UML for Agents" In: Wagner, G., Lesperance, Y. and Yu, E. Proceedings of the Agent-Oriented Information Systems Workshop, AOIS 2000, Eds., Austin, pp. 3--17, 2000.
 
8
J. Odell, H. Parunak, M. Fleisher. "The Role of Roles in Designing Effective Agent Organizations." In: A. Garcia, C. Lucena, F. Zamboneli, A. Omicini, J. Castro, (Eds.) Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS 2603. Berlin: Springer, 2003.
 
9
J. Odell, Parunal, H., S. Breuckner, M. Fleischer. "Temporal Aspects of Dynamic Role Assignment,". In: Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) IV, P. Giorgini, Jörg Müller, James Odell, eds., Lecture Notes on Computer Science volume (forthcoming), Springer, Berlin, 2004.
 
10
OMG. Agent Platform Special Interest Group: Agent Technology. In: Green Paper. Version 1.0, 2000.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
UML: Unified Modeling Language Specification, version 2.0, OMG. Available at: <http://www.uml.org>. Accessed in: December 10, 2004.
 
15
 
16
L. Yu, B. Schmid. "A Conceptual Framework for Agent-Oriented and Role-Based Work on Modeling." In: G. Wagner, E. Yu (Eds.). Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems, 1999.
 
17
WSDL. Web Services Description Language (WSDL), version 1.1, W3C. Available at: <http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl>. Accessed in: December 10, 2004.
 
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Viviane Torres da Silva: colleagues
Ricardo Choren Noya: colleagues
Carlos J. P. de Lucena: colleagues