ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Personality characteristics in an XP team: a repertory grid study
Full text PdfPdf (277 KB)
Source ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 30 ,  Issue 4  (July 2005) table of contents
SESSION: Human and Social Factors of Software Engineering (HSSE) table of contents
Pages: 1 - 7  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0163-5948
Also published in ...
Authors
S. Michelle Young  University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
Helen M. Edwards  University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
Sharon McDonald  University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
J. Barrie Thompson  University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 118,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082983.1083123
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There is a "folk belief" that certain personalities fit with particular systems development roles: however, there is little evidence to confirm this supposition. As part of a larger study an XP development team was investigated using a repertory grid approach (this is discussed in detail) to determine whether coherent personalities and characteristics emerge for different roles. The results, which are inevitably limited, suggest that this is the case. Further work remains to be done to build a large corpus of data for future analysis before firm mappings can be made between appropriate personality characteristics and software development roles.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bell, R. C. Using SPSS to analyse repertory grid data. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress on Personal Construct Psychology, Barcelona, 2-71, 1997.
 
2
Cooper. C. Individual Differences. Arnold, London, 2002.
 
3
Denzin N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London, 2000.
 
4
Fransella, F., Bell, R. and Bannister, D. A manual for repertory grid technique. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 2004.
 
5
Gaines, B. and Shaw, M. E. Using knowledge acquisition and representation tools to support scientific communities. <u>http://repgrid.com/reports/KBS/AAA194/index.html.</u> 12th May 2002.
 
6
Kelly, S. The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New York., 1955.
 
7
Kline, P. An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge, London, 1996
 
8
Kruskal, J. B., and Wish. M. Multidimensional Scaling. Sage Publications. Beverly Hills. CA, 1978.
 
9
Nijkamp, P. and Voogd, H. Multidimensional and homogenous scaling in spatial analysis. Chapter 12. In Recent Developments in Spatial Data Analysis: Methodology, Measurement, Models (Eds, Bahrenburg, G., Fischer, M. M. and Nijkamp, P.) Gower Publishing Co., Brookfield, Vermont. 1984
 
10
Stewart, V. Enquire Within Developments Ltd.. 1997.
 
11
Stewart, V. On the importance of the contrast pole. <u>http://enquirewithin.co.nz/HINTS/contrast.htm</u>. 21st December 2003.
 
12
Young, S. M. An Exploratory investigation into Personality Characteristics Associated with Systems Development Team Roles. PhD Thesis. University of Sunderland, UK, 2004.

Collaborative Colleagues:
S. Michelle Young: colleagues
Helen M. Edwards: colleagues
Sharon McDonald: colleagues
J. Barrie Thompson: colleagues