|
ABSTRACT
Cost estimation is important in software development for controlling and planning software risks and schedule. Good estimation models, such as COCOMO, can avoid insufficient resources being allocated to a project. In this study, we find that COCOMO's estimates can be improved via WRAPPER- a feature subset selection method developed by the data mining community. Using data sets from the PROMISE repository, we show WRAPPER significantly and dramatically improves COCOMO's predictive power.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Barry W. Boehm , Clark , Horowitz , Brown , Reifer , Chulani , Ray Madachy , Bert Steece, Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II with Cdrom, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000
|
| |
3
|
P. S. L. M. L. NJ, "Your guide to price-s: Estimating cost and schedule of software development and support," 1998.
|
| |
4
|
L. H. Putnam, Software Cost Estimating and Life-Cycle Control: Getting the Software Numbers, New York. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 1980.
|
| |
5
|
D. of USA, "Parametric cost estimating handbook, second edition," 1999.
|
| |
6
|
J. Sayyad Shirabad and T. Menzies, "The PROMISE Repository of Software Engineering Databases.." School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada, 2005. Available from http://promise.site.uottawa.ca/SERepository.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
|