ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The type of evidence produced by empirical software engineers
Full text PdfPdf (86 KB)
Source ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 30 ,  Issue 4  (July 2005) table of contents
SESSION: Realising Evidence-Based Software Engineering (REBSE) table of contents
Pages: 1 - 4  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0163-5948
Also published in ...
Authors
Judith Segal  The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK
Antony Grinyer  CSW Group Ltd, Oxford Business Park South, Oxford, England
Helen Sharp  The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082983.1083176
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on the research published between the years 1997 and 2003 inclusive in the journal of Empirical Software Engineering, drawing on the taxonomy developed by Glass et al. in [3]. We found that the research was somewhat narrow in topic with about half the papers focusing on measurement/metrics, review and inspection; that researchers were almost as interested in formulating as in evaluating; that hypothesis testing and laboratory experiments dominated evaluations; that research was not very likely to focus on people and extremely unlikely to refer to other disciplines. We discuss our findings in the context of making empirical software engineering more relevant to practitioners.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Glass, R. L., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V. Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature. Information and Software Technology, 44, 491--506, 2002.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9


Collaborative Colleagues:
Judith Segal: colleagues
Antony Grinyer: colleagues
Helen Sharp: colleagues