Representing design tradeoffs in safety-critical systems

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Representing design tradeoffs in safety-critical systems

Full text

Pdf (100 KB)

Source

ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 30 , Issue 4 (July 2005) table of contents

SESSION: Workshop on Architecting Dependable Systems (WADS) table of contents

Pages: 1 - 5

Year of Publication: 2005

ISSN:0163-5948

Also published in ...

Authors

Jennifer Morris	Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Philip Koopman	Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 9, Downloads (12 Months): 63, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTex EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082983.1083228 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Different fault-tolerance strategies have been shown to be effective at achieving fail-safe behavior in a number of safety-critical application domains with different dependability, service, and cost requirements. A technique for comparing the domain profiles and their fault-tolerance strategies could assist architects of new safety-critical systems in choosing an appropriate fault-tolerance strategy. We suggest an approach using Kiviat graphs to visually represent the dependability, service, and cost profile of a system, and show how such a graph can be used to analyze automotive x-by-wire applications.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	BART. BART System Facts. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Website, http://www.bart.gov/about/history/systemFacts.asp, accessed February 28, 2005.
	2	Margarita Esponda , Raúl Rojas, A graphical comparison of RISC processors, ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, v.20 n.4, p.2-8, Sept. 1992 [doi>10.1145/142880.142884]
	3	Kenneth W. Kolence , Philip J. Kiviat, Software unit profiles & Kiviat figures, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, v.2 n.3, p.2-12, September 1973 [doi>10.1145/1041613.1041614]
	4	Nancy G. Leveson, Safeware: system safety and computers, ACM Press, New York, NY, 1995
	5	U.S. Department of Transportation. Air Travel Consumer Reports. U.S. Department of Transportation Website, http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/reports/index.htm, accessed February 28, 2005.