A framework for describing and understanding mining tools in software development

ABSTRACT

We propose a framework for describing, comparing and understanding tools for the mining of software repositories. The fundamental premise of this framework is that mining should be done by considering the specific needs of the users and the tasks to be supported by the mined information. First, different types of users have distinct needs, and these needs should be taken into account by tool designers. Second, the data sources available, and mined, will determine if those needs can be satisfied. Our framework is based upon three main principles: the type of user, the objective of the user, and the mined information. This framework has the following purposes: to help tool designers in the understanding and comparison of different tools, to assist users in the assessment of a potential tool; and to identify new research areas. We use this framework to describe several mining tools and to suggest future research directions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Matthew Chalmers , Kerry Rodden , Dominique Brodbeck, The order of things: activity-centered information access, Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web 7, p.359-367, April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
• 2: Davor Cubranic , Kellogg S. Booth, Coordinating Open-Source Software Development, Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Enabling Technologies on Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, p.61-68, June 16-18, 1999
• 3: Davor ČubraniĆ , Gail C. Murphy , Janice Singer , Kellogg S. Booth, Learning from project history: a case study for software development, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 06-10, 2004, Chicago, Illinois, USA [doi>10.1145/1031607.1031622]
• 4: Michael Fischer , Martin Pinzger , Harald Gall, Populating a Release History Database from Version Control and Bug Tracking Systems, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, p.23, September 22-26, 2003
• 5: D. M. German. Mining CVS repositories, the softChange experience. In 1st International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, 2004.
• 6: D. M. German, A. Hindle, and N. Jordan. Visualizing the evolution of software using softChange. In Proc. of the 16th Internation Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2004), pages 336--341, 2004.
• 7: J. Grundy, Software Architecture Modeling, Analysis and Implementation with SoftArch, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34)-Volume 9, p.9051, January 03-06, 2001
• 8: Carl Gutwin , Reagan Penner , Kevin Schneider, Group awareness in distributed software development, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 06-10, 2004, Chicago, Illinois, USA [doi>10.1145/1031607.1031621]
• 9: Mik Kersten , Gail C. Murphy, Mylar: a degree-of-interest model for IDEs, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, p.159-168, March 14-18, 2005, Chicago, Illinois [doi>10.1145/1052898.1052912]
• 10: Rob Lintern , Jeff Michaud , Margaret-Anne Storey , Xiaomin Wu, Plugging-in visualization: experiences integrating a visualization tool with Eclipse, Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization, June 11-13, 2003, San Diego, California [doi>10.1145/774833.774840]
• 11: H. Richter, G. D. Abowd, C. Miller, and H. Funk. Tagging knowledge acquisition to facilitate knowledge traceability. International Journal on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 14(1):3--19, Feb. 2004.
• 12: Martin P. Robillard , Gail C. Murphy, FEAT: a tool for locating, describing, and analyzing concerns in source code, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 13: K. Schneider, C. Gutwin, R. Penner, and D. Paquette. Mining a software developer's local interaction history. In Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, 2004.
• 14: Janice Singer , Robert Elves , Margaret-Anne Storey, NavTracks: Supporting Navigation in Software, Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, p.173-175, May 15-16, 2005 [doi>10.1109/WPC.2005.25]
• 15: Margaret-Anne D. Storey , Davor Čubranić , Daniel M. German, On the use of visualization to support awareness of human activities in software development: a survey and a framework, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Software visualization, May 14-15, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri [doi>10.1145/1056018.1056045]
• 16: Andrew Walenstein, Observing and Measuring Cognitive Support: Steps Toward Systematic Tool Evaluation and Engineering, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, p.185, May 10-11, 2003
• 17: Alan Wexelblat, Communities through Time: Using History for Social Navigation, Community Computing and Support Systems, Social Interaction in Networked Communities [the book is based on the Kyoto Meeting on Social Interaction and Communityware, held in Kyoto, Japan, in June 1998], p.281-298, June 01, 1998
• 18: Xiaomin Wu , Adam Murray , Margaret-Anne Storey , Rob Lintern, A Reverse Engineering Approach to Support Software Maintenance: Version Control Knowledge Extraction, Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE'04), p.90-99, November 08-12, 2004

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.8 Database applications
          Subjects: Data mining

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.3 PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
      D.3.3 Language Constructs and Features
          Subjects: Frameworks

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.3 Software Management
          Subjects: Software development

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Measurement, Performance