Richard Helm
- 1.R. Anderson. Two-dimensional mathematical notation. In K. Fu, editor, Syntactic Pattern Recognition Applications. Springer-Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- 2.J. Bentley. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Communications of the A CM, 18(9):509-511, Sept. 1975. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.H. Bunke. Attributed programmed graph grammars and their application to schematic diagram interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 4(6):574-582, Nov. 1982.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.S.-K. Chang. A method for the structural analysis of two-dimensional mathematical expressions. Information Science, 2(3):253-272, July 1970.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.E. Golin, R. V. Rubin, and J. Walker II. The visual programmers workbench, in Information Processing (IFIP), pages 143-148. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.(North Holland), 1989.Google Scholar
- 6.E. J. Golin and S. P. Reiss. The specification of visual language syntax. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, pages 105-110. IEEE Press, 1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7.D. Harel. Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming, 8:231-274, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.N. Heintze, J. Jaffar, S. Michaylov, P. Stuckey, and R. Yap. The CLP(~) programmer's manual. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Monash University, 1987.Google Scholar
- 9.A. R. Helm and K. Marriott. Declarative graphics. In International Conference on Logic Programming, volume 225, pages 513-527. Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.A. R. Helm and K. Marriott. Declarative specification of visual languages. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages. IEEE Press, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11.K. M. Kahn and V. A. Saraswat. Complete visualizations of concurrent programs and their executions, in IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages. IEEE Press, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 12.F. Lakin. Visual grammars for visual languages. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 683-688, 1987.Google Scholar
- 13.G. Martin, J. Pittman, K. Wittenburg, R. Cohen, and T. Parish. Sign here, please. Byte, pages 243- 251, July 1989.Google Scholar
- 14.W.-H. Tsai and K.-S. Fu. Attributed grammara tool for combining syntactic and statistical approaches to pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 10(12):873-885, Dec. 1980.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 15.P. D. Wellner. Statemaster: A UIMS based on statecharts for prototyping and target implementation. In Computer Human Interaction (CHI), pages 177- 182. ACM Press, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.C. G. Wolf, J. g, Rhyne, and H. Ellozy. The paperlike interface. In G. Salvendy and M. J. Smith, editors, Designing and Using Human-Computer interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems, pages 494- 501. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.(North Holland), 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Building visual language parsers
Recommendations
Multibox parsers
Traditional compiler front end generating tools such as Lex/Yacc assume a front end consisting of two boxes: a lexical box and a syntax box. Lex produces a lexical analyzer using regular expressions as a token description. Yacc generates a syntax ...
Multibox Parsers: No More Handwritten Lexical Analyzers
Tools are available to generate the parser part of the compiler front end from the grammar describing the language being parsed. Tools like Lex/Yacc assume that the parser has two parts, or "boxes": the lexical analyzer and the syntax analyzer. This ...
Generating parsers for affix grammars
Affix grammars are two-level grammars which are similar to van Wijngaarden's two-level grammars used in the definition of Algol 68. Affix grammars are shown by Koster to be equal in power to van Wijngaarden grammars. They are much more suited to parsing ...
Comments