ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automatic acknowledgement indexing: expanding the semantics of contribution in the CiteSeer digital library
Full text PdfPdf (391 KB)
Source International Conference On Knowledge Capture archive
Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge capture table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
SESSION: Information extraction table of contents
Pages: 19 - 26  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-163-5
Authors
Isaac G. Councill  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
C. Lee Giles  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Hui Han  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Eren Manavoglu  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1088622.1088627
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Acknowledgements in research publications, like citations, indicate influential contributions to scientific work; however, large-scale acknowledgement analyses have traditionally been impractical due to the high cost of manual information extraction. In this paper we describe a mixture method for automatically mining acknowledgements from research documents using a combination of a Support Vector Machine and regular expressions. The algorithm has been implemented as a plug-in to the CiteSeer Digital Library and the extraction results have been integrated with the traditional metadata and citation index of the CiteSeer system. As a demonstration, we use CiteSeer's autonomous citation indexing (ACI) feature to measure the relative impact of acknowledged entities, and present the top twenty acknowledged entities within the archive.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
R.D. Cameron. A universal citation database as a catalyst for reform in scholarly communication. First Monday, 2(4). www.firstmonday.org, 1997.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
8
 
9
D. Edge. Quantitative measures of communication in science. Hist. Sci. 17: 102--134, 1979.
10
 
11
E. Garfield. Quantitative measures of communication in science. Science 144: 649--654, 1964.
 
12
C.L. Giles & I.G. Councill. Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgement indexing. PNAS 101(51): 17599--17604, 2004.
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
K.W. McCain. Communication, competition, and secrecy: the production and dissemination research-related information in genetics. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 16: 491--516, 1991.
 
19
 
20
A. Mikheev, C. Groover, & M. Moens. Description of the LTG System Used for MUC-7. In Proc. Of MUC-7, 1998.
 
21
S. Redner. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. Eur. Phys. Jour. 4: 131--134, 1998.
 
22
K. Seymore, A. McCallum, & R. Rosenfeld. Learning hidden Markov model structure for information extraction. In Proc. of AAAI 99 Workshop on Machine Learning for Information Extraction, pp 37--42, 1999.
 
23


Collaborative Colleagues:
Isaac G. Councill: colleagues
C. Lee Giles: colleagues
Hui Han: colleagues
Eren Manavoglu: colleagues