ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the impossibility of dimension reduction in l1
Full text PdfPdf (244 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 52 ,  Issue 5  (September 2005) table of contents
Pages: 766 - 788  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Bo Brinkman  Miami University, Oxford, Ohio
Moses Charikar  Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 101,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1089023.1089026
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma shows that any n points in Euclidean space (i.e., ℝn with distances measured under the ℓ2 norm) may be mapped down to O((log n)/ε2) dimensions such that no pairwise distance is distorted by more than a (1 + ε) factor. Determining whether such dimension reduction is possible in ℓ1 has been an intriguing open question. We show strong lower bounds for general dimension reduction in ℓ1. We give an explicit family of n points in ℓ1 such that any embedding with constant distortion D requires nΩ(1/D2) dimensions. This proves that there is no analog of the Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma for ℓ1; in fact, embedding with any constant distortion requires nΩ(1) dimensions. Further, embedding the points into ℓ1 with (1+ε) distortion requires n½−O(ε log(1/ε)) dimensions. Our proof establishes this lower bound for shortest path metrics of series-parallel graphs. We make extensive use of linear programming and duality in devising our bounds. We expect that the tools and techniques we develop will be useful for future investigations of embeddings into ℓ1.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
Ball, K. 1990. Isometric embedding in lp-spaces. Europ. J. Combinat. 11, 305--311.
 
6
Bourgain, J. 1985. On Lipschitz embedding of finite metric spaces into Hilbert space. Isr. J. Math. 52, 46--52.
 
7
 
8
 
9
Dasgupta, S., and Gupta, A. 1999. An elementary proof of the Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma. Tech. Rep. TR-99-06, International Computer Science Institute, UC Berkeley.
 
10
de Reyna, J. A., and Rodriguez-Piazza, L. 1992. Finite metric spaces needing high dimension for Lipschitz embeddings in Banach spaces. Isr. J. Math. 79, 103--111.
 
11
Deza, M., and Laurent, M. 1997. Geometry of Cuts and Metrics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
Johnson, W., and Lindenstrauss, J. 1984. Extensions of Lipschitz mapping into Hilbert space. Contemp. Math. 26, 189--206.
 
19
 
20
Lee, J., and Naor, A. 2004. Embedding the diamond graph in lp and dimension reduction in l1. Geomet. Funct. Anal. 14, 4 (Aug.), 745--474.
 
21
Linial, N. 2002. Finite metric spaces---combinatorics, geometry and algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians III. 573--586.
 
22
Linial, N., London, E., and Rabinovich, Y. 1995. The geometry of graphs and some of its algorithmic applications. Combinatorica 15, 215--245.
 
23
Matoušek, J. 1996. On the distortion required for embedding finite metric spaces into normed spaces. Isr. J. Math. 93, 333--344.
 
24
Matoušek, J. 2002. Chapter 15: Embedding finite metric spaces into euclidean spaces. Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 212. Springer-Verlag.
25
 
26
27
 
28
Schechtman, G. 1987. More on embedding subspaces of Lp in ℓnr. Composi. Math. 61, 2, 159--169.
 
29
Talagrand, M. 1990. Embedding subspaces of L1 into ℓn1. Proceedings of the American Mathetmatical Society, vol. 108, 2, 363--369.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bo Brinkman: colleagues
Moses Charikar: colleagues