ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Convergence law for random graphs with specified degree sequence
Full text PdfPdf (200 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) archive
Volume 6 ,  Issue 4  (October 2005) table of contents
Pages: 727 - 748  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1529-3785
Author
James F. Lynch  Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1094622.1094627
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The degree sequence of an n-vertex graph is d0,…,dn−1, where each di is the number of vertices of degree i in the graph. A random graph with degree sequence d0,…,dn−1 is a randomly selected member of the set of graphs on {1,…,n} with that degree sequence, all choices being equally likely. Let λ01,… be a sequence of nonnegative reals summing to 1. A class of finite graphs has degree sequences approximated by λ01,… if, for every i and n, the members of the class of size n have λi n + o(n) vertices of degree i. Our main result is a convergence law for random graphs with degree sequences approximated by some sequence λ01,…. With certain conditions on the sequence λ01,…, the probability of any first-order sentence on random graphs of size n converges to a limit as n grows.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Adamic, L. A. and Huberman, B. A. 1999. Growth dynamics of the world wide web. Nature 401, 131.
 
4
Aiello, W., Chung, F., and Lu, L. 2001. A random graph model for power law graphs. Experimental Math 10, 53--66.
 
5
 
6
Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M. 1995. Susceptible-infectious-recovered epidemic models with dynamic partnerships. J. Math. Biology 33, 661--675.
 
7
Ball, F., Mollison, and Scalia-Tomba, G. 1997. Epidemics with two levels of mixing. Ann. Appl. Probab. 7, 46--89.
 
8
Barabási, A., Albert, R., and Jeong, H. 1999. Scale-free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the world wide web. Physica A 272, 173--187.
 
9
Bhalla, U. S. and Iyengar, R. 1999. Emergent properties of networks of biological signalling pathways. Science 283, 381--387.
 
10
Bollobás, B. 1985. Random Graphs. Academic Press, London.
 
11
Bower, J. M. and Bolouri, H. 2001. Computational Modeling of Genetic and Biochemical Networks. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
 
12
 
13
Cohen, J. E., Briand, E., and Newman, C. M. 1990. Community Food Webs: Data and Theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
 
14
Cohen, R., Erez, K., ben Avraham, D., and Havlin, S. 2000. Resilience of the Internet to random breakdowns. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4626--4628.
 
15
Derrida, B. and Pomeau, Y. 1986. Random networks of automata: A simple annealed approximation. Europhys. Lett. 1, 45--49.
 
16
Ehrenfeucht, A. 1961. An application of games to the completeness problem for formalized theories. Fund. Math. 49, 129--141.
 
17
Erdős, P. and Rényi, A. 1959. On random graphs. Pub. Math 6, 290--297.
 
18
Erdős, P. and Rényi, A. 1960. On the evolution of random graphs. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutato Int. Kozl. 5, 17--61.
19
 
20
Gaifman, H. 1982. On local and non-local properties. In Proceedings of the Herbrand Symposium Logic Colloquium '81. North Holland.
 
21
Gilbert, E. 1961. Random plane networks. J. SIAM 9, 533--543.
 
22
Glance, N. S. and Huberman, B. A. 1993. The outbreak of cooperation. J. Math. Soc. 17, 281--302.
 
23
Granovetter, M. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Soc. 83, 1420--1443.
 
24
Harris, T. E. 1989. The Theory of Branching Processes. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
 
25
Kauffman, S. A. 1984. Emergent properties in random complex automata. Physica D 10, 145--156.
 
26
Kauffman, S. A. 1993. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
 
27
Keeling, M. J. 1999. The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 266, 859--867.
 
28
Kosterev, D. N., Taylor, C. W., and Mittelstadt, W. A. 1999. A model validation for the August 10, 1996 WSCC system outage. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 14, 967--979.
 
29
Kretschmar, M. and Morris, M. 1996. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. Math. Biosciences 133, 165--195.
 
30
 
31
 
32
Łuczak, T. 1992. Sparse random graphs with a given degree sequence. In Random Graphs, Vol. 2, A. Freize and T. Łuczak, Eds. Wiley, New York, 165--182.
 
33
Lynch, J. F. 1985. Probabilities of sfirst-order sentences about unary functions. Trans. AMS 287, 543--568.
 
34
Lynch, J. F. 1992. Probabilities of sentences about very sparse random graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 3, 33--53.
 
35
Lynch, J. F. 2002. Critical points for random boolean networks. Physica D 172, 49--64.
 
36
McKay, B. D. 1985. Asymptotics for symmetric 0-1 matrices with prescribed row sums. Ars Combinatorica 19A, 15--25.
 
37
 
38
 
39
Newman, M. E. J. 2001. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Prod. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98, 404--409.
 
40
Newman, M. E. J., Strogatz, S. H., and Watts, D. J. 2001. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118.
 
41
Sattenspiel, L. and Simon, C. P. 1988. The spread and persistence of infectious diseases in structured populations. Math. Biosci. 90, 367--383.
 
42
Strogatz, S. H. 2001. Exploring complex networks. Nature 410, 268--276.
 
43
Valente, T. W. 1996. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Netw. 18, 69--89.
 
44
Williams, R. J. and Martinez, N. D. 2000. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404, 180--183.