What ideal end users teach us about collaborative software

ABSTRACT

Many studies have evaluated different uses of collaborative software. Typically, the research has focused on the shortcomings and, sometimes, the ways end users succeed or fail to work around these shortcomings. In a recent field study, surprisingly, a group demonstrated unimpaired dexterity using a full range of collaborative software. Some interesting lessons emerged from observing these "perfect" collaborators. Lessons include implications for more typical or "less than perfect" end users, especially around the adoption of collaboration technology. Also, there is a general, but subtle, lesson that studying successful users of technology (or "ideal end users" as we put it) can be as valuable as studying those who struggle with technology and highlight its shortcomings.

REFERENCES

• 1: Jakob Bardram, Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.89-98, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289483]
• 2: Bansler, J. P., & Havn, E. (2003). Technology-use mediation: Making sense of electronic communication in an organizational context. Florida, USA: ACM Press. 135--143.
• 3: Cleidson R. B. de Souza , David Redmiles , Paul Dourish, "Breaking the code", moving between private and public work in collaborative software development, Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, November 09-12, 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/958160.958177]
• 4: Rebecca E. Grinter, Using a configuration management tool to coordinate software development, Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, p.168-177, August 13-16, 1995, Milpitas, California, United States [doi>10.1145/224019.224036]
• 5: Indira R. Guzman , Jeffrey M. Stanton , Kathryn R. Stam , Vibha Vijayasri , Isabelle Yamodo , Nasriah Zakaria , Cavinda Caldera, A qualitative study of the occupational subculture of information systems employees in organizations, Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment, April 22-24, 2004, Tucson, AZ, USA [doi>10.1145/982372.982388]
• 6: Kraut, R., Fish, R.,Root, R.& Chalfonte, B. (1990). Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology. In S. Oskamp & Spacapan (Eds.), People's Reactions to Technology: Newberry Park: Sage, 145--199.
• 7: Gloria Mark, Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.11 n.3, p.349-387, 2002 [doi>10.1023/A:1021289427473 ]
• 8: Gloria Mark , Steven Poltrock, Diffusion of a collaborative technology cross distance, Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, September 30-October 03, 2001, Boulder, Colorado, USA [doi>10.1145/500286.500321]
• 9: Leysia Palen , Jonathan Grudin, Discretionary adoption of group support software: lessons from calendar applications, Implementing collaboration technologies in industry: case examples and lessons learned, Springer-Verlag, London, 2003
• 10: Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd editiotn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• 11: Terry Winograd , Fernando Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1987

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.1 Office Automation
          Subjects: Groupware

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Computer-supported cooperative work; Collaborative computing

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management

Keywords:
CSCW, cooperative work, groupware, workplace collaboration