ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Handling frequent updates of moving objects
Full text PdfPdf (221 KB)
Source Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Bremen, Germany
SESSION: Paper session DB-5 (databases): updates and change detection table of contents
Pages: 493 - 500  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-140-6
Authors
Bin Lin  University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
Jianwen Su  University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099554.1099691
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A critical issue in moving object databases is to develop appropriate indexing structures for continuously moving object locations so that queries can still be performed efficiently. However, such location changes typically cause a high volume of updates, which in turn poses serious problems on maintaining index structures. In this paper we propose a Lazy Group Update (LGU) algorithm for disk-based index structures of moving objects. LGU contains two key additional structures to group ``similar'' updates so that they can be performed together: a disk-based insertion buffer (I-Buffer) for each internal node, and a memory-based deletion table (D-Table) for the entire tree. Different strategies of ``pushing down'' an overflow I-Buffer to the next level are studied. Comprehensive empirical studies over uniform and skewed datasets, as well as simulated street traffic data show that LGU achieves a significant improvement on update throughput while allowing a reasonable performance for queries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
L. Arge. Private communications, 2004.
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
T. Brinkhoff. Generating traffic data. Bulletin on Data Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, 26(2):19--25, 2003.
 
7
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
M. L. Lee, W. Hsu, C. S. Jensen, and K. L. Teo. Supporting frequent updates in R-trees: a bottom-up approach. In Proc. VLDB, 2003.
16
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
22
 
23
J. Zhou and Ke. A. Ross. Buffering Accesses to Memory-Resident Index Structures. VLDB, 2003.
 
24
S. Saltenis. http://www.cs.auc.dk/ simas/tpr/tpr.tar.gz.
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
Y. Tao, D. Papadias, and J. Sun. The TPR*-tree: An optimized spatio-temporal access method for predictive queries. In VLDB, 2003.
 
31
J. Tayeb, O. Ulusoy, and O. Wolfson. A quadtree based dynamic attribute indexing method. The Computer Journal, 41(3), 1998.
32
 
33
 
34
35