|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
The variance of customer sojourn time (or waiting time) is used, either explicitly or implicitly, as an indication of fairness for as long as queueing theory exists. In this work we demonstrate that this quantity has a disadvantage as a fairness measure, since it is not local to the busy period in which it is measured. It therefore may account for customer discrepancies which are not relevant to fairness of scheduling. We show that RAQFM, a recently proposed job fairness measure, does possess such a locality property. We further show that within a large class of fairness measures RAQFM is unique in possessing this property. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||