skip to main content
10.1145/1102256.1102287acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Using an interactive evolutionary algorithm to help fitting a cochlear implant

Published:25 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants are electronic devices that stimulate directly the auditory nerve to allow totally deaf patients to hear again. This paper presents an interactive evolutionary algorithm (IEA) designed to help finding the best parameters of a cochlear implant for a specific patient.If early cochlear implants only featured one electrode, modern devices now offer up to 22 electrodes, with the hope to be able to transmit more details and help the patient hear better. The work presented in this paper shows however that having more electrodes is not necessarily better.Tests on a patient show surprisingly that some combinations of electrodes yield better results than others, with the problem that there is no real way to determine which electrode is beneficial to speech understanding and which is not.The best result obtained by the patient on a speech understanding evaluation protocol was 48.5/100 after 10 years of fitting sessions by an expert practitioner. For many reasons explained in this paper, the evaluation of the best parameter setting found by the IEA in one day was 91.5/100.

References

  1. Banzhaf W, "Handbook of Evolutionary Computation" (chapter on Interactive Evolution) Oxford University Press 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Durant, E. A., Hearing Aid Fitting with Genetic Algorithms, PHD Thesis, University of Michigan, USA 2002]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Pierre Collet, Evelyne Lutton, Marc Schoenauer, and Jean Louchet, "Take it EASEA," Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1917:891--901, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Pierre Collet. Easea language, 2004. http://sourceforge.net/projects/easea.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Loizou P., "Mimicking the Human Ear," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 15(5), 101--130, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Loizou P., Poroy O., Dorman M., "The Effect of Parametric Variations of Cochlear Implant Processors on Speech Understanding," Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 2000, pp790--802.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. MXM Laboratories, http://mxmlab.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schwefel H.-P., Numerical Optimization of Computer Models. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Takagi, H., "Interactive Evolutionary Computation: System Optimisation Based on Human Subjective Evaluation," Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES'98) Vienna, Austria, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohsaki M., Sakamoto S., Takagi H., "Development and Evaluation of an IEC Fitting System for Hearing Aids," International Conference on Acoustics (ICA2001), Rome, Italy, 5A.15.02 (Sept. 2--7, 2001).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Takagi, H., "Interactive Evolution Computation: Fusion of the Capabilities of EC Optimization and Human Evaluation," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 89, No 9, Sept 2002, pp 1275--1296.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using an interactive evolutionary algorithm to help fitting a cochlear implant

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '05: Proceedings of the 7th annual workshop on Genetic and evolutionary computation
        June 2005
        431 pages
        ISBN:9781450378000
        DOI:10.1145/1102256

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 June 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader