Technology for the humdrum: trajectories, interactional needs and a care setting

ABSTRACT

We report on a care setting where staff looking after ex-psychiatric hospital patients were supported by mobile and stationary communications technology (e.g. mobile phones and a messaging system) and physical artefacts (e.g. whiteboards and Post-It notes). Building on previous ethnographic investigations, we show that the notion of trajectory (or an ongoing course of action) was important for understanding staff's care work. We argue that sensitivity to this notion was helpful in identifying the key transitions, cycles, plans and management issues in staff's ongoing work. We present verified trajectory-informed scenarios emerging from fieldwork and show that these snapshots of work were useful for establishing current and future interactional needs among staff and residents. Finally we describe issues pertinent to new technology design emerging from these trajectory-informed scenarios and discuss the usefulness of the concept for informing socio-technical system design.

REFERENCES

• 1: Jakob E. Bardram , Claus Bossen, Mobility Work: The Spatial Dimension of Collaboration at a Hospital, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.14 n.2, p.131-160, April 2005 [doi>10.1007/s10606-005-0989-y]
• 2: Barley, S. R. (1988). On Technology, Time, and Social Order: Technologically Induced Change in the Temporal Organization of Radiological Work. In Dubinskas F. A (Ed.), Making Time: Ethnographies of High-Technology Organizations (pp. 123--169). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• 3: Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hughes, J., Rouncefield, M., (2003). Designing With Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings. In Proceedings of the 2004 Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI2004), (pp. 4--13). Brisbane, Australia: Ergonomics Society of Australia.
• 4: Cheverst, K., Fitton, D., Rouncefield, M. and Graham, C. (2004). 'Smart Mobs' and Technology Probes: Evaluting Texting at Work. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation (ECITE 2004) (pp. 73--80). Amsterdam, Holland: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
• 5: Clarke, A. A Social Worlds Research Adventure: The Case of Reproductive Science. (1990). In Cozzens, S. and Gieryn, T. (Eds). Theories of Science in Society (pp. 23--50). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• 6: Alan Cooper , Paul Saffo, The Inmates Are Running the Asylum, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1999
• 7: Andy Crabtree , Tom Rodden, Domestic Routines and Design for the Home, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.13 n.2, p.191-220, April 2004 [doi>10.1023/B:COSU.0000045712.26840.a4]
• 8: Simon M. Kaplan , Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Designing support for remote intensive-care telehealth using the locales framework, Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, p.173-184, August 18-20, 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/263552.263604]
• 9: Fitzpatrick, G. (1998). Locales Framework: Understanding and Designing for Cooperative Work. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland.
• 10: Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• 11: Bill Gaver , Tony Dunne , Elena Pacenti, Design: Cultural probes, interactions, v.6 n.1, p.21-29, Jan./Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/291224.291235]
• 12: Graham, C, Cheverst K, Fitton D, & Rouncefield M. (2005a). "How Do You Turn A Duck Into A Soul Singer? Put It In The Microwave Until Its Bill Withers": Some social features of a simple technology. In Proceedings of the Less Is More 2005, Microsoft, Cambridge, April 2005.
• 13: Graham, C., Cheverst, C., and Rouncefield, M. (2005b). Going More Public: Situated Display Design through Co-realisation. Accepted, DUX 2005: Conference on Designing for User eXperience, San Francisco, CA (3--5 Nov).
• 14: Mark Hartswood , Rob Procter , Roger Slack , Alex Voß , Monika Büscher , Mark Rouncefield , Philippe Rouchy, Co-realisation: towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, v.14 n.2, p.9-30, September 2002
• 15: Kuutti, K. (1996) A Framework for HCI Research. In Nardi. B. (Ed.) Context and Consciousness (pp. 17--45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• 16: Bonnie A. Nardi , Steve Whittaker , Erin Bradner, Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.79-88, December 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/358916.358975]
• 17: David Pinelle , Carl Gutwin , Saul Greenberg, Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.10 n.4, p.281-311, December 2003 [doi>10.1145/966930.966932]
• 18: Jenny Preece , Yvonne Rogers , Helen Sharp , David Benyon, Human-Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 1994
• 19: Madhu Reddy , Paul Dourish, A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 16-20, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA [doi>10.1145/587078.587126]
• 20: Reason, P. (Ed.). (1994). Participation in Human Inquiry. London: Sage Publications.
• 21: Schatzman, L. & Strauss, A. (1973). Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. New York: Prentice Hall
• 22: Douglas Schuler , Aki Namioka, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1993
• 23: Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference Groups as Perspectives. American Journal of Sociology, 60. 522--29.
• 24: Strauss, A. (1978). A Social World Perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1. 119--128.
• 25: Strauss, A., Corbin, J., Fagerhaugh, S., Glaser, B., Maines, D., Suczek, B., and Wiener, C. (Eds.) (1984). Chronic Illness and the Quality of Life. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
• 26: Strauss, A. (1988). The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2). 163--178.
• 27: Strauss, A. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
• 28: Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
• 29: Vetere, F., Howard, S. and Gibbs, M. R. (2005). Phatic Technologies: Sustaining Sociability through Ubiquitous Computing. First International Workshop on Social Implications of Ubiquitous Technology. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005).
• 30: Watson, M. & Sanderson, P. (2004). Sonification Helps Eyes-free Respiratory Monitoring and Task Timesharing. Human Factors, 46(3). 497--517.
• 31: Zerubavel, E. (1985). Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. California: University of California Press.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
care settings, field study, situated displays, trajectories